CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD005958910

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2017

7 novembre 2017

Indeed, although a judge was notified about the urgent interception of the applicant’s telephone communications, she did not carry out any judicial review of the police’s decision to tap the applicant’

Page 45 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303DEC005806013

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

It was also put to the officers that the area in which the applicant was arrested was segregated and heavily policed and that surrounding members of the public were Celtic supporters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD004086122

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2024

18 juillet 2024

  50231/13, 14   January 2021) which underscored the police’s obligation to investigate homophobic motives behind an assault. 20 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0226DEC002614495

Admin. suprême

26 février 1996

26 février 1996

        When Halil ikincisoy arrived at his uncle's building, one policeman stayed at the entrance of the building and the other two went up to the uncle's flat on the second

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD007059711

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2015

21 juillet 2015

At the time the applicant was the head of a division in the Economic Crime Bureau ( Ekonomikas policijas birojs ) in the Main Police Department in Riga ( Rīgas galvenā policijas pārvalde ). 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510DEC003946809

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2016

10 mai 2016

[As a result] a policeman who was on duty at a polling station in Himara was injured; pressure was exerted upon other citizens who were casting their votes; Himara’s central street was blocked; an explosion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003408105

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

In connection with a meeting in September 2002 in one member’s home, the second applicant had been arrested and taken to a police station and raped by a policeman.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701REP002571194

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

  Subsequently they were convicted under the Morals (Policing) Act of insulting/attacking a named policeman in the presence of other persons in relation to precisely the same incident.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

His request was refused because parental leave could be granted to a policeman only if his children were left without maternal care. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1128JUD001262987

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1991

28 novembre 1991

On 31 May 1985 the applicant spoke with Mr Garbade in the presence of a policeman who took notes and stopped the interview after an hour, on the grounds that they were no longer speaking about the case

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118161

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2013

6 mars 2013

    While being taken out of the building the applicant requested the policeman Mr Ya. to loosen the handcuffs because the tight lock caused pain and blueness to his hands.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC001039009

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

In particular, the court found that the applicant had not clearly stated why the police’s findings were false and had not indicated that he had not committed the alleged offence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD002049713

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2020

26 mai 2020

enactment of the Amendment had been public knowledge for some time; consequently, the applicant could have notified the police of his intention well in advance, in which case the judicial review of the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD000489216

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2026

30 avril 2026

    On various dates the Administrative Court allowed the police’s claims and dismissed the applicants’ respective counterclaims.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC006236316

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

    On 19 May 2016 the Oslo City Court ( tingrett ) granted the police’s request to authorise that the family, pending their removal to Afghanistan, could be detained at the Police Immigration

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228468

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

regarding privileged materials, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411DEC000229303

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

The domestic authorities had found that the police’s acting had been covered by the arrest warrant and was not excessive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0121DEC002947395

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 1997

21 janvier 1997

On being politely told that I was only allowed a       maximum of three tins, I graciously accepted them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0426DEC007442001

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2005

26 avril 2005

[AZ] works at the STT as a policeman-driver ... but this does not mean that he can have no private interests. There is no evidence that, in negotiating with K.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC004092705

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

    On 30 May 2005, following an internal investigation, the Pre-trial Investigation Department of the State Police ( Valsts policijas Galvenās Kriminālpolicijas pārvaldes Pirmstiesas izmeklēšanas

Source officielle