Article 537 §§ 1 and 2   “The person who has suffered prejudice may request compensation at a later stage before the same court.

On the same date the applicant was released on bail. 12.

At the same time, it awarded him EUR 500 in compensation for non-pecuniary damage. The amount was not explained by any particular reasons.

  Đorđević, a lawyer practising in the same town. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.

At the same time, the Fund also repeated its request for a refund of half of the benefit received and annulled its earlier refund request of 2 February 2001.

    On 19 December 2001, following a hearing of the appeal held on the same day, the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of 23 October 2000. THE LAW I.

On 22 October 1998 a similar complaint, lodged with the Bureau of the Council of Ministers, was transmitted to the same Ministry.

On the same date the court accepted the settlement between the parties regarding the applicant’s access rights.

On the same day the investigator suspended the proceedings as the applicant was in hospital.

    The applicant further complained that the criminal proceedings lasted unreasonably long.

After a few minutes the first applicant was hit again in the same way. He was held at the police station overnight because he refused to confess to a burglary.

The decision became final and binding on the same day. 20.

On the same day the Office of Immigration and Nationality commenced asylum proceedings and held a hearing.

On the same day the applicant was released from detention under an undertaking not to abscond. 12.

    The Government accepted that the custody proceedings had lasted quite a long time.

On the same date, the County Administrative Court struck out the cases concerning the second applicant owing to the bankruptcy.

On the same day the Counter Terrorism Office (“the CTO”) of the Cyprus Police and the Cyprus Intelligence Service (“CIS”) were informed of their arrival.

    On the same date the applicant brought an application for release.

On the same day an order for his detention on remand was issued and confirmed by the prosecutor of the Znamenskiy District of the Oryol Region.

  The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him lasted too long.   3.