Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Lastly, the Government provided no explanation for replacing the trial judge in the course of the proceedings, which contributed to their overall duration. 32.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

During that review the trial was fixed for five days in August   2007. 26.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    The Court notes that the applicant lodged his civil claim against Mr L. in the course of the criminal trial of the latter and sought compensation for his injuries, which were the subject

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

The Court is not convinced by the Government's argument that the applicant was partly responsible for the length of the pre-trial stage by requesting an additional investigation.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

It further reiterates that the most appropriate form of redress would, in principle, be trial de novo or the reopening of the proceedings, if requested (see Öcalan v.

    On 30 September pre-trial investigation was terminated and the criminal case was sent to the Smila Court. 11.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial