The applicant again submitted such a claim which was rejected by the Migration Board and the Migration Court on 23 May 2011 and 11 July 2011, respectively.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mirosław Garlicki v.

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of E.L. v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Y. v.

Section 80/A, entitled “Crisis caused by mass immigration” “(1)     A state of crisis caused by mass immigration may be declared if: a)     the number of people arriving in Hungary

Its reasoning may be summarised as follows.   Analysis of the first four Guja criteria   21.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

On 6   May 1996 the Heilbronn District Court ( Amtsgericht ) issued an arrest warrant against the applicant.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kasparov and Others v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kanciał v.

    Detention on remand may be imposed if: ... (3)     an accused has been charged with a serious offence or has relapsed into crime in the manner defined in the Criminal Code; or (

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Navalnyy and Gunko v.

    Article 232 § 2 provided that the prosecutor was to summon to attend the plea-bargain hearing the accused and victim who filed a claim for damages in a due and timely manner; the public prosecutor

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background to the case 4 .

Lithuania (no. 46454/11, §§   20-53, 31   May 2018); and Al   Nashiri v. Romania (no.   33234/12, §§ 22-61, 31   May 2018).