CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1780
11 décembre 2008
In this connection, the Court observed that the applicant's lawyer and the judges of the Assize Court had engaged in various disagreements over the course of the trial, as a result of which his lawyer
ECLI:CEDH:002-9764
26 février 1992
  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): institution of proceedings in the magistrate's court.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9766
ECLI:CEDH:002-9770
ECLI:CEDH:002-9762
ECLI:CEDH:002-9768
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD002890402
4 octobre 2005
    Imposing detention in the course of an investigation, the court shall determine its term for a period not exceeding 3 months. 2.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9774
27 février 1992
  Period to be taken into consideration Starting-point (in each case): date of institution of proceedings in the District Court.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9778
ECLI:CEDH:002-9776
ECLI:CEDH:002-9772
1ère Chambre
DTA_2400451_20250605
5 juin 2025
En cours d'exécution du contrat, par un courrier du 17 novembre 2023, et 5 courriers du 27 novembre 2023, la communauté d'agglomération du pays nord Martinique a reproché à la Société martiniquaise
ECLI:CEDH:002-9042
18 février 1997
  ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION Cantonal court's observations not communicated to either of parties to dispute before Federal Court - cantonal court could not be regarded as opponent of either of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC003097112
1 octobre 2013
the safety of an aircraft (Count 2) began in the Crown Court on 4 April 2008.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD006596911
3 octobre 2017
The District Court found that the dormitory was transferred to the Company in breach of domestic law. 9.     On 2 June 2010 the appeal court upheld the judgment and it became final. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD002693808
5 juin 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-a - Competent court)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0509JUD002070218
9 mai 2023
The applicant company could have learned of the Supreme Court’s decision from the website of that court. The Court’s assessment (a)    General principles 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0715JUD002282420
15 juillet 2025
It was dismissed by the Constitutional Court on 14 January 2020 as being lodged outside the four-month time-limit, counting from the date the contested Supreme Court’s decision had been adopted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0224JUD002875410
24 février 2022
  The Court therefore considers that the Government’s objection, in so far as it is understood to be also related to the second and ninth applicants, must be rejected. The Court’s conclusion 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD003252613
11 avril 2024
    The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court – that is, the right to institute proceedings before the courts in civil matters – constitutes an element which is inherent in the
Page 46 sur 36913
SOCIETE FRANCOIS, DUFLOT, COURT-MENIGOZ SOCIETE CIVILE PROFESSIONNELLE D'AVOCATS
24/06/2018
Voir →