CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

987 résultats pour « Frank Banere »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205DEC000154306

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2006

5 décembre 2006

because they had not had at their disposal any procedure which would have allowed them to obtain a final decision before the date of the planned demonstration when the first-instance decisions had banned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005140512

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2017

21 septembre 2017

France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 88-93, 10 November 2015.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC002380006

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2008

4 janvier 2008

Misuse of drugs was a serious matter, causing damage to health (there being no safe way to inject banned drugs) and raising serious concerns as to the maintenance of good order and discipline in prisons

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD001622405

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

The freedom of mass information is also protected, and censorship is banned. B.     Civil Code of the Russian Federation 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0313DEC000136507

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2007

13 mars 2007

Upon expulsion, the alien must also be deprived of the right to reside in the Republic of Bulgaria and be banned from entering it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911JUD005196799

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2007

11 septembre 2007

They were also banned from public office for the same period. 36.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC007465101

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

France (dec.), no. 68864/01, 11 March 2004; Aksoy v. Turkey , judgment of 18 December 1996, ECHR 1996-VI, §§ 51-52; and Akdivar and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD003306010

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2016

5 avril 2016

France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 132, 133, 23 April 2015; Nikula v. Finland , no.   31611/96, § 45, ECHR 2002 II; and Steur v. the Netherlands , no.   39657/98, § 36, ECHR 2003 XI).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD003747711

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

  France (dec.), no.   53430/99, ECHR 2001 ‑ XI ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD003232706

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2008

15 mai 2008

France (no.   3) , judgment of 24 November 1994, Series   A no.   296 ‑ C, §   44).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD008090912

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

  France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, §   15, ECHR 2002-VIII).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD000182008

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

France and Boultif v. Switzerland , [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark , no.   56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yılmaz v. Germany , no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1124JUD001397288

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 1993

24 novembre 1993

France, 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, p. 16, para. 36; Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, Series A no. 205, pp. 16-18, paras. 28 and 36; and S. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703DEC001321209

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

However, as N.A. was banned from leaving Israel (pending criminal and bankruptcy proceedings lodged against him), this promise was left unfulfilled.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1212JUD001189485

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 1991

12 décembre 1991

the reasons given in the previous decisions, it noted that the accused was also suspected of having incited another person to burn down a restaurant in Switzerland, causing damage of 300,000 Swiss francs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD003444504

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §   119, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV; and Dikme v. Turkey , no. 20869/92, §   89, ECHR 2000 ‑ VIII). 60.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0517DEC004415898

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2001

17 mai 2001

  In the international area Poland and, similarly, France and Germany, are perceived as single-nation States, regardless of the fact that there exist distinct ethnic groups (e.g. the inhabitants of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1220JUD004415898

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2001

20 décembre 2001

In the international sphere Poland and, similarly, France and Germany, are perceived as single-nation States, regardless of the fact that there exist distinct ethnic groups (e.g. the inhabitants of Alsace

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD001123609

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

Section 62 – Right to benefit from publications “(1)     A convicted prisoner may purchase periodical or non-periodical publications at his or her own expense provided that they are not banned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD001498809

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2018

27 novembre 2018

In their view, local authorities had not banned any public events organised by the applicants but had warned them of the consequences of breaking the law by holding such events.

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 50

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.