CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205DEC000154306
5 décembre 2006
because they had not had at their disposal any procedure which would have allowed them to obtain a final decision before the date of the planned demonstration when the first-instance decisions had banned
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005140512
21 septembre 2017
France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 88-93, 10 November 2015.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC002380006
4 janvier 2008
Misuse of drugs was a serious matter, causing damage to health (there being no safe way to inject banned drugs) and raising serious concerns as to the maintenance of good order and discipline in prisons
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD001622405
21 novembre 2017
The freedom of mass information is also protected, and censorship is banned. B.     Civil Code of the Russian Federation 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0313DEC000136507
13 mars 2007
Upon expulsion, the alien must also be deprived of the right to reside in the Republic of Bulgaria and be banned from entering it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911JUD005196799
11 septembre 2007
They were also banned from public office for the same period. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC007465101
8 juillet 2008
France (dec.), no. 68864/01, 11 March 2004; Aksoy v. Turkey , judgment of 18 December 1996, ECHR 1996-VI, §§ 51-52; and Akdivar and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD003306010
5 avril 2016
France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 132, 133, 23 April 2015; Nikula v. Finland , no.   31611/96, § 45, ECHR 2002 II; and Steur v. the Netherlands , no.   39657/98, § 36, ECHR 2003 XI).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD003747711
23 novembre 2021
  France (dec.), no.   53430/99, ECHR 2001 ‑ XI ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD003232706
15 mai 2008
France (no.   3) , judgment of 24 November 1994, Series   A no.   296 ‑ C, §   44).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD008090912
13 novembre 2014
  France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, §   15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD000182008
24 novembre 2009
France and Boultif v. Switzerland , [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark , no.   56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yılmaz v. Germany , no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1124JUD001397288
24 novembre 1993
France, 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, p. 16, para. 36; Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, Series A no. 205, pp. 16-18, paras. 28 and 36; and S. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703DEC001321209
3 juillet 2012
However, as N.A. was banned from leaving Israel (pending criminal and bankruptcy proceedings lodged against him), this promise was left unfulfilled.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1212JUD001189485
12 décembre 1991
the reasons given in the previous decisions, it noted that the accused was also suspected of having incited another person to burn down a restaurant in Switzerland, causing damage of 300,000 Swiss francs
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD003444504
11 janvier 2007
France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §   119, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV; and Dikme v. Turkey , no. 20869/92, §   89, ECHR 2000 ‑ VIII). 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0517DEC004415898
17 mai 2001
  In the international area Poland and, similarly, France and Germany, are perceived as single-nation States, regardless of the fact that there exist distinct ethnic groups (e.g. the inhabitants of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1220JUD004415898
20 décembre 2001
In the international sphere Poland and, similarly, France and Germany, are perceived as single-nation States, regardless of the fact that there exist distinct ethnic groups (e.g. the inhabitants of Alsace
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD001123609
9 avril 2019
Section 62 – Right to benefit from publications “(1)     A convicted prisoner may purchase periodical or non-periodical publications at his or her own expense provided that they are not banned
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD001498809
27 novembre 2018
In their view, local authorities had not banned any public events organised by the applicants but had warned them of the consequences of breaking the law by holding such events.
Page 46 sur 50
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.