Netherlands (2008) 46 EHRR 49) where there is an assertion of guilt in a separate process in circumstances in which that guilt has not been properly established, or has even been rejected, in a criminal

Par conclusions déposées et soutenues à l'audience Mme Isabelle Y..., comparante, assistée de son conseil Maître Guille-Meghabbar, demande à la cour de rejeter les demandes formées par M.

, of which 900 Dutch guilders were suspended on the condition that the applicant cooperate in an examination of which type of school would be most appropriate for Ruben's needs.

  The Court found that despite the applicant's acquittal the suspicion against him had not been dissipated in the sense that no further argument could be drawn from this suspicion as to his guilt

  THE LAW   Whereas, as regards the complaint that the presiding judge disclosed details of the Applicant's previous convictions to the lay assessors before determining the issue of his guilt

X...bénéficiait ainsi de certains droits, sans qu'il soit jamais stipulé que le Groupe GUILDINVEST abandonne le système ducroire, mais il n'apparaît nullement que ce système mis en place par la GUILDE

The court referred, among other evidence of the applicant’s guilt, to the administrative-offence proceedings for hooliganism that had been discontinued on 1   February 2010. 8.

injuries suffered while in detention: violation   Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Statement by prosecutor when discontinuing criminal proceedings that suspect had atoned for his guilt

said, it had nevertheless continued to refer to the applicants as “the accused/convicted person” when it had not yet ruled, in the light of the evidence and the submissions for the defence, on their guilt

after evaluation of the entire case file, considered that Judge I.C.B. had merely taken a procedural decision, had not made any assessment on the existence of the alleged crimes or on the applicants’ guilt

Gorj County Court again decided to replace the applicant’s detention with an obligation not to leave the country holding that the conclusions of a technical report raised doubts about the applicant’s guilt

Le président du tribunal a désigné Mme Guidi, première conseillère, pour exercer les pouvoirs qui lui sont attribués par les articles L. 572-5, L. 572-6, L. 614-5, L. 614-6, L. 614-9, L. 614-11, L. 614

décision déférée dans toutes ses dispositions, à l'égard de toutes les parties au recours Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me GUILLOIS

Wallerich, président de chambre, - Mme Guidi, présidente-assesseure, - Mme Cabecas, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe, le 27 novembre 2025.

Le rapport de Mme Guidi, a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M. C...

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Guidi, présidente, - les conclusions de M. Denizot, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Guidi, présidente, - et les conclusions de Mme Antoniazzi, rapporteure publique.

Le rapport de Mme Guidi a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.