The officers immediately knocked him to the ground and hit twice with a gun butt on his head.

The conditions attached to his release were set out in a letter given to him on his release.

upon his request.

Blood samples were taken from him for DNA analysis and the police searched his flat and through his mobile phone and seized a number of his personal items. 14.

Law :Article   5 § 1(a) – The Court found no indication that the applicant had waived his right to appear and defend himself in the proceedings against him in 1989.

adequate time and facilities to prepare his defence as she was unable to communicate with him.

In May 2003 the applicant requested the Cherkassy Regional Prosecutor’s Office to provide him with his passport so that he could marry.

The applicant was never served with a copy of the administrative offence report issued against him or with other materials in his case-file.

They had put a bag over his head and forced him into a car. They took him to a building where they had taken the bag off.

He had pulled at the first applicant’s sleeve to bring him to his knees, and had then forced him to the ground with L.P.’s help, laying him on his right side and then turning him on to his stomach.

He also advised him to continue to take his medication regularly.

In August 1995 the Regional Court convicted him of burglary and sentenced him to five months’ imprisonment, suspended for a probation period of three years.

According to his medical records, the hospital had been aware of his previous suicide attempts. The applicant unsuccessfully sued the HSC for compensation for her son’s death.

They split his legs apart until he fell and then lifted him by his hands shackled behind. They tied his head to his legs with a belt and pulled up his shackled hands.

he was hung down; electric shocks were given to various parts of his body, making him faint repeatedly; his head, eyes, ears, back, stomach and kidneys were punched and slapped; officers jumped over his

[The applicant's counsel] submitted that his solicitor might have advised him to say nothing.

He claimed that his wife was bigger than him, so he had to respond when she attacked him.

  The applicant further submits that he had a close-knit and stable family in the Netherlands whose members remained in close contact with him despite his detention.

3, that his having been subjected to surveillance by way of permanent video recording had constituted an unjustified interference with his private life and that in the criminal proceedings against him