CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193928
24 mai 2019
The court concluded that the applicant’s detention between 26 June and 21 August 2014 had not had any legal basis.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD000707004
9 janvier 2014
14 KLETSOVA NATALYA MIKHAYLOVNA 1936 26 June 2002 15 KOCHUBEY ANATOLIY SERGEYEVICH 1952 26 June 2002 16 KOLPAK VERA MIKHAYLOVNA 1941 7 November 2001 17 KONOSHEVICH VALERIY NIKOLAYEVICH 1946 31 May 2002
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915DEC001584013
15 septembre 2015
The applicant had been arrested only on 10 June 2010 and had been detained in Galați Prison only from 29 June 2010.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622DEC003369696
22 juin 2000
    By a decision of 28 March 1990, which was made enforceable on 25 June 1990, the Milan Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 30 June
ECLI:CEDH:001-121878
28 mai 2013
On 25 June 2008 the Stavropol Regional Court upheld the extension order of 7 June 2008 on appeal.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110JUD000121807
10 novembre 2009
    On 23 June 2008 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the applications to the Government.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0403DEC001463012
3 avril 2018
    On 12 June 2009 C was taken to an investigator for questioning.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1988493-2109260
3 mai 2007
  Despite the decision of 3 June the march did take place on 11 June 2005. It was attended by approximately 3,000 people and was protected by the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC002231203
19 juin 2007
On 14   November   2002 and 19 June 2003 the Court of Appeal quashed the judgments of 5   June and 8 July 2002 and remitted the cases for a fresh consideration.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519DEC002776713
19 mai 2015
    On 26 June 2003 the applicant asked the first-instance court to resume the proceedings. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-148352
4 novembre 2014
On 21 and 22 June 2012 the applicant was detained handcuffed and was deprived of food and water. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409JUD004951222
9 avril 2024
The court listed the application for directions on 17 June 2021 and instructed the parties to file any possible objections by that date. The prosecution did so on 14 June 2017. 15 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622DEC003091896
    Between 15 June 1989 and 13 November 1996, the bailiff made 19 attempts to recover possession, on 15 June 1989, 17 October 1989, 10 January 1990, 23 March 1990, 28   June 1990, 11 October
ECLI:CEDH:001-186979
17 septembre 2018
THIRD SECTION Application no. 14099/18 M.H. and Others against Slovakia lodged on 19 March 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns a police operation that took place on 19   June
ECLI:CEDH:001-182205
13 mars 2018
On 14 June 2013 the Pest Central District Court decided to release the first applicant from the house arrest as well, but the release order was served on him only on 20 June 2013, six days after the date
ECLI:CEDH:001-185209
5 juillet 2018
On 8 June 2017 the applicant’s lawyer applied to the SMS with a written request to grant the applicant refugee status. There is no information about the outcome of this request.
ECLI:CEDH:001-241836
15 janvier 2025
The first and second applicants requested the court to clarify the decision of 8 June 2021 to specify the venue of meetings with A.A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC006584311
1 octobre 2013
Municipal Court in Novi Pazar   I.br.928/06 of 20 June 2006 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000109710
15 mai 2025
  32401/10 and 19   others, §§ 158-59, 7   June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Andrey Rylkov Foundation and Others v. Russia, nos.
ECLI:CEDH:001-186578
4 septembre 2018
Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 4 September 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 21171/16 Gheorghe COBZARU against Romania lodged on 1 April 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 25 June
Page 47 sur 2732
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.