The Court considers that it was vital for the authorities to verify that lead, even if it might eventually prove unfounded (see Kolevi , cited above, §§   200-01). 50.

publications and combating Internet offences, the Denizli Criminal Court of First Instance ordered the blocking of the website http://sites.google.com/site/kemalizminkarinagrisi/benimhikayem/atatuerk-koessi

Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, §   84, 9 July 2009, and Kolevi v. Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, § 177, 5 November 2009). 53.

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi v.

outcome of the criminal proceedings, especially as the courts in the former proceedings relied on the evidence obtained in the course of the latter (see paragraph   34 above; see, mutatis mutandis , Koceski

Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; and Kolevi v. Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, § 192, 5 November 2009). 73.

Magdalini KOLETSI-KONTOPOULOU 1966 Chania Greek 9. Nafsika KOLOBATSOU 1965 Acharnai Greek 10. Evdokia KOMBINOGLOU 1944 Kilkis Greek 11. Anna KONTOGIANNIDOU 1960 Kavala Greek   12.

The material of the case file does not suggest that the investigation’s conclusions were based on a thorough, objective and impartial analysis of all relevant elements (see Kolevi v.

Beteja e betejave do të jetë në Himarë, në Himarë maten forcat e Himariotëve që deklarojnë Elinizmin e tyre dhe që Himara të njihet si zone me kombësi greke, të ketë shkollë greke dhe të ketë të gjithë

follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and, where appropriate, the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi

  2747/02, §§ 86 and 88, 8 July 2010; and Kolevi v.   Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, §   201, 5 November 2009). 50.

Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 84, ECHR 2009 ‑ ..., and Kolevi v.   Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, § 177, 5 November 2009). 50 .

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi v.

This means not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection with those implicated in the events but also a practical independence (see Kolevi v.

This calls for not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection with those implicated in the events but also a practical independence (see, for example, Kolevi v.

lives being put at risk unintentionally (see Delovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 56148/15, § 25, 7 July 2020, concerning a road accident with lethal consequences, and Koceski

It thus seems that section 2(2) of the SRDA does not create a cause of action in respect of the applicant’s grievance under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Kolevi v.

aim pursued and whether the reasons adduced by them to justify the interference are “relevant and sufficient” (see, among other authorities, Pedersen and Baadsgaard , cited above, §§ 69 and 70, and Kobenter

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 1108/02 by KOLEVI