Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520DEC003176508
20 mai 2014
20 mai 2014
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC006553801
19 mars 2002
19 mars 2002
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115023
7 novembre 2012
7 novembre 2012
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC005186019
11 juillet 2023
11 juillet 2023
On 22 March 2017 the County Social Welfare Board set the applicant’s contact rights in respect of X at two times per year, specifying that the contact sessions were to be carried out when
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174514
24 mai 2017
24 mai 2017
The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6827
24 août 1998
24 août 1998
In case before Court, with the exception of analysis of data relating to applicant’s mobile telephones, which could and should have been carried out earlier, and excessive workload referred to by trial
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5625
31 janvier 2002
31 janvier 2002
In March 1999 the public prosecutor discontinued the investigation into his disappearance.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1224
22 décembre 2009
22 décembre 2009
Law – Article 41: The Grand Chamber upheld the Chamber’s departure from the case-law with regard to the application of Article 41 in cases of constructive expropriation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115060
9 novembre 2012
9 novembre 2012
What other investigative activities were carried out as regards the applicant prior to the test purchase? 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245127
3 septembre 2025
3 septembre 2025
The parties are asked to provide relevant examples of domestic case-law. 2.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2767233-3032473
17 juin 2009
17 juin 2009
The judgment on just satisfaction was delivered on 21 October 2008 when the Court decided to vary its case-law on application of Article 41 in the case of indirect expropriation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158068
23 septembre 2015
23 septembre 2015
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115428
20 novembre 2012
20 novembre 2012
It was upheld by the Chelyabinsk Regional Court on 30 March 2006.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248486
12 janvier 2026
12 janvier 2026
He was last in contact on 13 March 2022.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002356894
15 mai 1996
15 mai 1996
, regard being had to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and that of the
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD006543710
10 décembre 2013
10 décembre 2013
In the case of Zarkov v.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2876661-3155414
30 septembre 2009
30 septembre 2009
On 18 March 2003 he was reprimanded by the Minister for Defence for breaching “military regulations” and for “failure to observe the duty of discretion in written or oral expression”.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12460
7 mai 2019
7 mai 2019
Presidential ordinance no. 809, which entered into force on 8 March 2019, extended the remit of the compensation board, set up in January 2013, to cases where the Court had found a violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10228
14 octobre 2014
14 octobre 2014
In the applicant’s case, the judicial authorities did not seem to have assessed whether the impugned prohibition was genuinely necessary for the proper conduct of the elections.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-894
13 juillet 2010
13 juillet 2010
In 2005 an additional inquiry into the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment was carried out.
Source officiellePage 47 sur 819