When, therefore, Parliament is presented as a legal entity, the imperialist terror imposed on Kurdistan has become lawful.

of that provision in that there had been no communication to the applicant before the hearing of the judge rapporteur’s report (although the advocate-general had been provided with a copy) or of the tenor

    On 19 July 1995 the applicant was taken into police custody by officers from the anti-terror branch of the Ankara Security Directorate in the course of an operation carried out against an

The Public Prosecutor referred to the provisions of the Anti-Terror Law.

  An investigation into those allegations was carried out concerning the director of the anti-terror branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate.

He was taken to the Anti-Terror branch of Ankara Security Directorate to be questioned.

obveznim odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

to the fact that the applicant had not received a copy of the Advocate-General’s submissions, the Court noted that the applicant, who was not represented by a lawyer, had been unable to ascertain the tenor

obveznim odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

xa0;    In an indictment dated 18 February 1992, the Public Prosecutor at the Diyarbakir State Security Court charged the applicant and four other students under Article 8 of the Anti-Terror

obveznim odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

Diyarbakır provincial gendarmerie command issued an arrest warrant in respect of the applicant, on the basis of which he was arrested and taken into custody on 12 April 1996 by police officers from the anti-terror

obveznim odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

/1996 and 112/1999) read as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another's property, when it results from violent acts or terror

feelings of insecurity in citizens ... (2) A terrorist act within the meaning of this Act is especially an act of violence committed for political reasons [motives] with a view to stirring up fear, terror

They alleged complicity in voluntary homicide, the destruction of property by an explosive device causing fatal injury, and conspiracy to undermine public order through intimidation and terror.

       Article 141 of the Turkish Criminal Code has been repealed by Law No. 3713 (Anti-Terror Law) of 12 April 1991.

Those phrases, which had been repeated in the article preceded by the phrase “do not hesitate”, could have caused homosexual people to feel stress, anguish and terror as, coupled with the hate speech throughout

    At the material time the applicants had been convicted of membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“Fetullahist Terror Organisation/

Civil Obligations Act reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror