CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC001154605
4 mai 2010
According to the applicants, in order to fulfil the requirements for their transfer to Albania they waived their right to appeal against the judgment that had led to their conviction.
Page 47 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0923JUD000715175
23 septembre 1982
neither the Government nor the various Ministries may give them orders or instructions on how they should apply the law in this or that case. 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0308DEC001871203
8 mars 2007
In the light of the result they considered it futile to pursue their action.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD001210103
31 mai 2007
In this connection, they maintained that the applicants could have sought redress from the Ankara Administrative Court by bringing a full remedy suit against the Ministry of Interior in respect of their
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0121JUD004465812
21 janvier 2020
As none of the men had their identity papers on them, they could not comply with the officers’ instructions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608JUD005498316
8 juin 2021
Upon their arrival, they were informed of the accusations brought against them and were interviewed in that connection, in their lawyer’s presence, first as suspects ( suspect ) and then as accused persons
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD005198807
13 décembre 2016
However, their route was blocked by the riot police and they were arrested, with excessive force allegedly being used against them. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429JUD003171221
29 avril 2025
2020 they had been subjected to treatment prohibited by the Convention, which had aroused in them feelings of fear, anguish and humiliation, and that there had been no effective investigation into the
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1021REP002449094
21 octobre 1999
Ismet Orakçi had taken them to their house and had then been released. The school was damaged, the windows all broken and part of the roof perforated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC001124313
25 juin 2013
In the light of this, the Board found it unreasonable for him to return there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD002721304
2 juillet 2009
They affirmed that they had lost the apartment through no fault of their own or of their parents’.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152959
17 février 2015
They claim that their consent was not valid, since they had been under duress at the time they signed the settlement agreements (some company representatives had allegedly threaten the applicants to initiate
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0604JUD005916612
4 juin 2015
They had contacted the police following the fire at their home and business stock in 2006 and 2008 and the murder of their daughter in 2008, but thereafter they had not dared to contact the authorities
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD003909020
8 octobre 2024
The interpreter, having asked them where they came from, told them that no one would be allowed to enter Cyprus and that they should return to Lebanon, or the police would escort them and take them back
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405DEC002274793
5 avril 1995
The reasons given for this were, inter alia, that a long time had passed since their parents last took care of them, that they only had little contact with their parents during the public care, that they
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0426JUD002749615
26 avril 2018
Preferably, they should be ‘saved’ before they have the opportunity to do anything wrong. The family could achieve this by organising another abduction and taking them to Iraq.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1201JUD000808008
1 décembre 2011
In these circumstances, the applicants had not been obliged to use another remedy in addition to the proceedings they had brought contesting the lawfulness of their detention. 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0921DEC003472097
21 septembre 1999
they warranted the maximum sentence; and that the court failed to take into account the time the applicants had spent in custody prior to their trial.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3388
4 avril 2006
They complained of the length of the custody and that they had been held incommunicado during that period.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110120
8 février 2012
The Minister also considered that the allegations they had made were insufficient and lacked credibility. On 5 October 2011, the applicants requested the re-examination of their request.