CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 412 résultats pour « Bedhale »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-176185

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2017

12 juillet 2017

Nevertheless, the applicant succeeded in having the Prosecutor General exercise his discretionary power to challenge the judgment on the applicants’ behalf in the Supreme Court by way of an appeal on points

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231517

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

The first and second applicants complained under Articles 2, 3 and 13 of the Convention, both in their own name and on behalf of their missing relative, about the disappearance of R.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1541786-1613608

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2005

14 décembre 2005

  The applicants   The case concerns an application brought by Ethel Teri Eskinazi, who has French and Turkish nationality, on her own behalf and on behalf of her daughter Caroline Ruth Chelouche

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162876

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2016

21 avril 2016

The applicant was not present at the hearing before Zagreb County Court when the request for his involuntary placement in the hospital was examined and the lawyer T.Ž. made no submission on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-92276

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2009

2 avril 2009

The public prosecutor had initially brought the proceedings concerning the pension rights on behalf of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC002232203

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2007

25 septembre 2007

In particular, he alleged that the courts had lacked impartiality and that they had disregarded the evidence on his behalf, had reached untenable conclusions as to the facts and, as a result, had given

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC000127517

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

However, no observations on his behalf have been submitted.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2740799-3004962

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

  The Gelendzhik town prosecutor, acting on behalf of the Institute and the person who had been allocated the applicant’s flat (a Mr M), brought proceedings against Ms Batsanina and her husband to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC003069521

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

THE LAW The Court first notes that Mr Ostojić had died before the application was lodged on behalf of the applicants (the relevant date is set out in the appended table).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237365

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2024

11 septembre 2024

  22457/16, § 177, 2 February 2021; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.   47848/08, §§ 130 ss., ECHR 2014; and B. v. Romania (no. 2) , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14300

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

the municipality of Grande-Synthe of insufficient action by France to prevent climate change: inadmissible (incompatible ratione personae) Facts – In November 2018 the applicant, acting on his own behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226030

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

Is there a conflict of interests between the first applicant, who has brought an application on behalf of the third applicant, and the third applicant   (see T.A. and Others v. the Republic of Moldova

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926DEC004351702

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2006

26 septembre 2006

particular, that as the court had decided on the basis of the case-file, he had been deprived of his right to defend himself, submit evidence, put questions to the witnesses and have witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10893

Admin. suprême

11 février 2016

11 février 2016

Ukraine - 15509/12 Judgment 11.2.2016 [Section V] Article 34 Victim Standing of mother to make Article   3 complaint on behalf of her son who died while in detention: victim status upheld Article

Source officielle
TA

2ème Chambre

DTA_2004990_20230605

Administratif

5 juin 2023

5 juin 2023

commission d'enquête à l'issue de l'enquête publique est insuffisamment motivé ; - le classement des parcelles AR 146, 147, 148, 149 et 150 situées sur le territoire de la commune de Roquefort-la-Bédoule

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC000552103

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2008

4 janvier 2008

  He claimed restitution on his behalf and on behalf of the second applicant, who had originally owned one fourth of the property, and three successors in title to the other original co-owners.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1203DEC003287696

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1996

3 décembre 1996

She complains on her own behalf and on behalf of her husband, her four children, her sister and her husband and their three children, all of whom live at the same address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC002709111

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

In particular, he complained that there had been no public hearing and that he could not examine witnesses on his behalf. THE LAW 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC003071921

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

THE LAW The Court firstly notes that Mr Simonović had died before the application was lodged on behalf of the applicants (the relevant date is set out in the appended table).

Source officielle
TA

REFERES

DTA_2500241_20250110

Administratif

10 janvier 2025

10 janvier 2025

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique tenue en présence de Mme Gaillard, greffière d'audience,: le rapport de Mme Rizzato, les observations de Me Bechaux, substituant Me Fourrey, représentant

Source officielle

Page 48 sur 521

← PrécédentSuivant →