CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Grenoble
DTA_2402257_20250116
16 janvier 2025
Par un mémoire enregistré le 30 août 2024, la société AXA France Iard, en sa qualité d'assureur de la société Maçonnerie du Faucigny, représentée par Me Favet, ne s'oppose pas à l'expertise sollicitée
Page 48 sur 606
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD000594504
5 avril 2007
The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the final judgment in his favour and alleged a violation of his property rights. 4.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191317
28 janvier 2019
The applicants obtained final court decisions in their favour listed in the appendix, ordering State authorities to perform various obligations in kind.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC001620007
15 avril 2014
Those decisions in the applicants’ favour became final and enforceable but the State delayed their enforcement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1201JUD007320301
1 décembre 2005
On 21 September 1999 the Chernyshevskiy District Court delivered two judgments in the applicant’s favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD001132402
4 octobre 2005
The applicant complained of the failure of the State authorities to execute the judgment of 11 June 2001 given in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0131JUD001051108
31 janvier 2012
The Government later informed the Court that they saw no possibility of enforcing the judgments in the applicants’ favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC000753916
17 novembre 2020
Main judgment in favour of the applicants 4 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD002531508
18 décembre 2012
The Court notes that the judgment in the applicant’s favour was delivered on 20 April 2007.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD001730303
29 novembre 2005
The applicant complained of the failure of the State authorities to execute the judgments of 28 May 1999 and 18 October 2000 given in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD002218507
14 février 2017
Judgments in the applicant’s favour 4. The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Ufa, the Republic of Bashkortostan. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0312JUD000175505
12 mars 2009
The applicants complained about the State authorities’ failure to enforce the judgments taken in their favour in due time.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2002:50
24 janvier 2002
. # Ayudas de Estado - Agricultura - Ayudas en favor de las producciones hortícolas con destino a la transformación industrial en Extremadura -Artículo 87 CE, apartados 1 y 3, letras a) y c) - Ayudas de
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD003482204
10 juillet 2014
Turning to the instant case, the Court observes that on 19 August 2002 the domestic court made a monetary award in the applicant’s favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD004226715
14 décembre 2021
THE JUDGMENT IN THE APPLICANT’S FAVOUR AND THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001299706
28 mai 2009
COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE LENGTHY NON-ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDGMENTS IN THE APPLICANT’S FAVOUR 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD001039804
11 décembre 2008
Non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicant’s favour 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD005478716
9 octobre 2018
On 26 December 2007, the Čačak Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicants. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD001789908
14 avril 2015
Therefore, the judgment in the applicant’s favour was enforced with a delay of 87 months. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD007502501
17 janvier 2008
The applicants complained about belated enforcement of judgments in their favour. 4.