The applicant and his lawyer were refused permission to meet, but the applicant managed to get a form to his lawyer authorising him to lodge an application with the European Court on his behalf.

assist in the disclosure of the crime, but he hid from preliminary investigation and his whereabouts were unknown, for which his search was initiated.

La. told the police that the gun belonged to him, he had received it from Lu. and had kept it, unloaded, at his apartment. 8.

Then the accusations were read to him in the presence of a lawyer and an English language interpreter – both appointed on his behalf by the authorities – who also assisted him during his subsequent questioning

    The applicant complained that the termination of his parental status had deprived him of the right to maintain contact with his son.

  From his statements and from documents submitted by him it appears that, on ..

On 10   January 2001 the Tashtypskiy District Court convicted him as charged but applied the act of general amnesty and ordered his immediate release.

On 7 September 2000, at about 8 a.m., B and T attacked the SLT leader in the corridor of his house and caused him fatal injuries. He died shortly after being transported to the hospital. 3.

It was accordingly necessary to detain him until his return to that facility in order to prevent him from re-offending.

However, the jury in his case was permitted to hold his silence against him on the basis that it found his decision to do so unreasonable without necessarily also finding that it was only sensibly attributable

He was then taken to his house, where he saw his parents talking to the police inspectors. He spat up blood on a tissue his mother was holding for him.

After a number of institutions had refused to accept him because of his condition, he was eventually admitted to a medical and social care centre, which found him to be in an advanced state of psychiatric

, the offers of promotion, the treats of dismissal, subjection to unpleasant working for the purpose of persuading him to terminate his membership of his union, or because he refused to do so.

, the entry in his file had not had any consequences for his ability to manifest or practise his religion during the relevant period.

He further alleges that following his abduction, on 19-21 October, these unidentified individuals tortured him to make him confess in having conspired to organise mass riots in Russia.

paternity at the child’s birth and that the child had lived with him. (2)     On the other hand, despite the fact that he had carried out some of his parental duties, his right of custody had

His lawyer advanced three main arguments in his defence: firstly, the evidence against him had been obtained illegally and so could not be used in the criminal proceedings; secondly, the police officers

According to the applicant, the undertaking contained an exhaustive list of restrictions that would apply to him after the termination of his work contract; a restriction on his right to leave the country

The applicant maintained that the drugs belonged to a third party (“J.”) who called at his house before the police arrived and had left his jacket with him.