in the case of a breach of those conditions.

In the light of all of these elements taken together, Article 6 did not apply in this case: incompatible ratione materiae .

Accordingly, Article 6(1) was not applicable in the instant case: incompatibleratione materiae .

It further complains of a lack of access to the case file due to the fact that it was protected by judicial confidentiality ( segredo de justiça ).

In fact, the provision of the law in question, by its very nature, removed the factual circumstances of the case from the scope of the domestic courts’ examination.

Merker, a lawyer practising in Leipzig. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  In the case of Patranin v.

At the time when he had applied for asylum in the Netherlands, it had not been crucial to his asylum case whether he came from the autonomous region or from Central Iraq.

On 1 June 2015 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the Government’s request. Law – Article 1 of Protocol No.

On   the whole, the Court reserves sufficient flexibility in defining the required standard of health care, deciding it on a case-by-case basis.

REJET ET CASSATION PARTIELLE SUR LE POURVOI DE : X... (ANTONIO), Y... (LUDOVINA DA CONCEICAO), EPOUSE X..., Y... X... (ROSA DE JESUS), Y... X... (THERESA DE JESUS), Y... X... (MANUEL), Y... X...

CASSATION SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR X...

LOCATION, POUR UNE DUREE DE DOUZE ANS, A LA SOCIETE D'AFFICHAGE LA ROUTE LE PIGNON D'UNE MAISON A USAGE DE PUBLICITE, QUE CE CONTRAT ETAIT SIGNE PAR UN REPRESENTANT DE LADITE SOCIETE ET PAR DAME Y..., MERE

CASSATION PARTIELLE SUR LE POURVOI DE X...

VU LE MEMOIRE PRODUIT ; SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE DE CASSATION, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 397 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE, 1382 DU CODE CIVIL, 485 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, DEFAUT DE MOTIFS

CASSATION SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : 1° X...

JEAN-JACQUES RESIDE BIEN CHEZ SA MERE A HENIN-LIETARD OU IL A SON DOMICILE ; ATTENDU CEPENDANT, QUE LES PRINCIPES GENERAUX ENONCES A L'ARTICLE L 511 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE CONCERNENT L'ENSEMBLE

D'UNE AFFECTION DE LONGUE DUREE, IL CONTINUERAIT, EN APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 4 BIS DE LA LOI DE BENEFICIER DE L'EXONERATION TOTALE DU TICKET MODERATEUR QUI AVAIT ETE PRECEDEMMENT ACCORDEE DU CHEF DE LA MERE