CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD007661911

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

    The applicant alleged that his right to a reasoned judgment had been infringed because the trial court had not given any details as to why it had accepted the police’s version of events and

Page 49 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD001799716

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

    The Administrative Court allowed the police’s claim, imposing a fine on the applicant in the amount of 50,000 Armenian drams (AMD – around 90   euros at the material time), and dismissed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC006633601

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2002

14 mai 2002

    The applicants also claim that the police’s intervention in the Horsmonden parade on 10 September 2000 parade, to which the police consented on 31 August 2000, amounted to violations of Articles

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230613

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

Specific defects: no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s discretion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001332002

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

He noted that the Turkish Cypriot police would respond in a similar manner to the Greek Cypriot police's new policy of kidnapping suspects in the buffer zone. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1203DEC001088884

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1986

3 décembre 1986

  A senior officer subsequently visited the applicant and apologised for the embarrassment and inconvenience caused to her by the police's failure to identify the officers concerned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004791509

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

It follows that the domestic courts merely accepted the police’s versions of the facts and the charges as presented in the relevant police reports without considering any other explanations, addressing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225961

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2011

7 avril 2011

the Prosecutor General, arguing that the criminal case against them had been fabricated with the aim of suppressing their freedom of expression and requesting a criminal inquiry in respect of the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0629DEC002552694

Admin. suprême

29 juin 1998

29 juin 1998

       The applicant was thrown into the back of an armoured car to lie along the back seat where he was continuously punched about the face and side of the head by the policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512DEC004546719

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2020

12 mai 2020

    Since 2006 the applicant had been serving as a policeman, most recently at the Pokrovsk Division of the National Police Main Department in the Donetsk Region (hereafter – Pokrovsk police

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928JUD006440311

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

    In the present case, it cannot be asserted that the applicant’s consent to come to the police station was totally free as he was de facto escorted there by a policeman.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188937

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

Arrest on charge of murder During detention on 11/12/2010 ORCH, Nizniy Novgorod Blows on belly, right eye, deprivation of oxygen with putting on a gas mask, he was put laying on the floor, with a policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154430

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2015

15 avril 2015

They suggested to the applicant to have his full-grown facial beard shaved and dressed into a policeman, so that he could escape in disguise. The applicant agreed. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC006502201

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006

La direction de la police d’État ( Valsts policija ) de Liepāja fut chargée de l’exécution de cette ordonnance, devenue effective dès le moment de son prononcé.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0512JUD006953501

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2010

12 mai 2010

    During his detention in the prison the applicant, as a former policeman, was detained in two cells for former policemen. These cells measured 13.6 and 7.8   square metres.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC002028608

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

The suspension from office of a policeman is ordered when he/she has intentionally committed a criminal act that would make him/she incompatible with his office; it is a measure taken for the protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC004559913

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

    According to the applicant, while escorting him to the meeting room the inspector M.A. without any reason started pulling his arm saying that he was a “dirty policeman” and that he knew those

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD004866699

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2007

17 juillet 2007

applicant alleged, in particular, violations of Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention in the context of his detention on remand as well as a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the police's

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD007442001

Admin. suprême

5 février 2008

5 février 2008

It has, however, been established that [VS] and [AZ] handed money to him on the police’s orders.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000423908

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

The applicant’s solicitor asserted that at this meeting a police officer indicated that it was the Metropolitan Police’s provisional view, given expressly without formal authority, that there was no offence

Source officielle