CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD007661911
16 janvier 2024
The applicant alleged that his right to a reasoned judgment had been infringed because the trial court had not given any details as to why it had accepted the police’s version of events and
Page 49 sur 79
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD001799716
9 avril 2026
The Administrative Court allowed the police’s claim, imposing a fine on the applicant in the amount of 50,000 Armenian drams (AMD – around 90 euros at the material time), and dismissed
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC006633601
14 mai 2002
The applicants also claim that the police’s intervention in the Horsmonden parade on 10 September 2000 parade, to which the police consented on 31 August 2000, amounted to violations of Articles
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230613
11 janvier 2024
Specific defects: no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s discretion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001332002
20 mai 2008
He noted that the Turkish Cypriot police would respond in a similar manner to the Greek Cypriot police's new policy of kidnapping suspects in the buffer zone. 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1203DEC001088884
3 décembre 1986
A senior officer subsequently visited the applicant and apologised for the embarrassment and inconvenience caused to her by the police's failure to identify the officers concerned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004791509
9 juin 2022
It follows that the domestic courts merely accepted the police’s versions of the facts and the charges as presented in the relevant police reports without considering any other explanations, addressing
ECLI:CEDH:001-225961
7 avril 2011
the Prosecutor General, arguing that the criminal case against them had been fabricated with the aim of suppressing their freedom of expression and requesting a criminal inquiry in respect of the police’s
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0629DEC002552694
29 juin 1998
The applicant was thrown into the back of an armoured car to lie along the back seat where he was continuously punched about the face and side of the head by the policeman
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512DEC004546719
12 mai 2020
Since 2006 the applicant had been serving as a policeman, most recently at the Pokrovsk Division of the National Police Main Department in the Donetsk Region (hereafter – Pokrovsk police
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928JUD006440311
28 septembre 2021
In the present case, it cannot be asserted that the applicant’s consent to come to the police station was totally free as he was de facto escorted there by a policeman.
ECLI:CEDH:001-188937
4 décembre 2018
Arrest on charge of murder During detention on 11/12/2010 ORCH, Nizniy Novgorod Blows on belly, right eye, deprivation of oxygen with putting on a gas mask, he was put laying on the floor, with a policeman
ECLI:CEDH:001-154430
15 avril 2015
They suggested to the applicant to have his full-grown facial beard shaved and dressed into a policeman, so that he could escape in disguise. The applicant agreed. 26.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC006502201
23 novembre 2006
La direction de la police d’État ( Valsts policija ) de Liepāja fut chargée de l’exécution de cette ordonnance, devenue effective dès le moment de son prononcé.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0512JUD006953501
12 mai 2010
During his detention in the prison the applicant, as a former policeman, was detained in two cells for former policemen. These cells measured 13.6 and 7.8 square metres.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC002028608
22 novembre 2011
The suspension from office of a policeman is ordered when he/she has intentionally committed a criminal act that would make him/she incompatible with his office; it is a measure taken for the protection
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC004559913
16 juin 2015
According to the applicant, while escorting him to the meeting room the inspector M.A. without any reason started pulling his arm saying that he was a “dirty policeman” and that he knew those
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD004866699
17 juillet 2007
applicant alleged, in particular, violations of Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention in the context of his detention on remand as well as a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the police's
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD007442001
5 février 2008
It has, however, been established that [VS] and [AZ] handed money to him on the police’s orders.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000423908
13 novembre 2012
The applicant’s solicitor asserted that at this meeting a police officer indicated that it was the Metropolitan Police’s provisional view, given expressly without formal authority, that there was no offence