On the same date he was put on the list of wanted persons. 8.

On the same date the term of the applicant detention was extended by the Panel; its decision being upheld by the Maribor Higher Court ( Višje sodišče v Mariboru ) on 20 June 2001.

Accordingly, the period in question lasted 14 years for two levels of jurisdiction, of which 12   years and 2 months elapsed at administrative level.

  On the same day the Public Prosecutor requested Slovenj Gradec District Court to open a criminal investigation into the Slovenj Gradec Police’s complaint against the applicant for the criminal offence

On the same date the Gavar Investigative Department instituted criminal proceedings for attempted murder and illegal possession of firearms.

    On 12 September 2000 the applicant lodged another case with the same court, claiming further damages. These two procedures were later joined. 9.

    On the same day the applicant was imprisoned. 13.

The applicant complained to the police that same night. P. was detained and was made to undergo an alcohol test, which revealed 1.42 ‰ of alcohol in his blood. 3.

By the same order the head of the penitentiary department was instructed to immediately separate all female minors from the adult inmates. 17.

On the same day the applicant’s appeal was heard and the court reserved its judgment. 18 .

The first claim was dismissed after a hearing which lasted five days in February and April 1989. The applicant applied for a review of the decision.

The Court considers that these objections must be rejected for the same reasons. 15.

On the same date two spent cartridge cases and a bullet were recovered from D.M.’s flat and one spent cartridge case, from the murder scene.

On the same day the applicant complained to the president of the Košice Regional Court that the proceedings had lasted unreasonably long and that he had not been heard by the appellate court.

The investigation, during which all the accused were questioned, lasted 5 years.

It lasted for 313 court days and was the longest trial in English legal history.

    The applicant company complained under the same Article that the Helsinki Administrative Court had not reasoned its decision sufficiently when it stated that the applicant company had been

    The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings on his appeal of 15 June 2011 against the continuation of his detention lasted too long.

But the enforcement of the judgments had lasted a short time overall.

    The applicant alleged that criminal proceedings conducted against him had lasted unreasonably long. 4.