inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 13381/02 by Imre Pál ÁGH against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting

inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14126/06 by Saida NIAZI against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

LETER against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 1   July   2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Elisabet Fura-Sandström

At the hearing of 9 June 2005 the lawyer of the third party argued before the second instance court sitting in a bench of two judges that the disputed property was not worth more than ROL 1,000,000,000

left; font-size:10pt } FIRST SECTION   DECISION   Application no. 44737/98 by Abdol Ali NAGHIPOUR against the Netherlands     The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Applications nos. 5258/06; 7652/06; 11985/06; 23724/06; 23756/06; 24563/06; 35154/06 and 40847/06 by Gligor PECEV   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 33155/04 by Kibar DOĞRU against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting

inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 67214/01 by Abidin DOĞAN against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

The applicant was tried by the National Security Court, sitting as a bench composed of two civilians and a high ranking military judge, on a charge of being a member of an armed organisation that was seeking

SECTION   FINAL DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 39914/98 by Ljuben TRIČKOVIĆ against Slovenia     The European Court of Human Rights (First Section) sitting

inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 42440/07 by Regina VON HOLTUM against Germany The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

The applicant’s appeal against this decision was upheld by the Regional Court ( rechtbank ) of The Hague sitting in Amsterdam on 3 November 2010.

His parents and two siblings live in Denmark. He married in January 1995, and he lives with his wife and their three children.

In relation to the claims lodged by their older siblings, the court decreased the awards to EUR 25,000 each.

    By an interlocutory judgment of 9 October 2012 not amenable to appeal, the District Court, sitting as a single judge, namely Judge L.M.V., dismissed the applicant’s application.

On 27 July 2005 the Supreme Commercial Court, sitting in a committee of three judges, decided to refer the case to the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court for supervisory review.

    On 10 April 2012 the insolvency judge, sitting in camera , authorised the auction sale as sought by the trustee.

    The decision to hold the third re-trial before a judge sitting alone 5.

He requested the Hague Regional Court sitting in Haarlem to take this into account in its decision to be taken.

procédure suivante : La société distribution Casino France a demandé au tribunal administratif de Grenoble d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du 28 janvier 2020 par lequel le maire de La Balme-de-Sillingy