The Commission also recalls the Benthem case which concerned the question whether in connection with his business as a garage-owner, an applicant should also be granted

          Therefore, in this case, unlike that of Benthem (see Eur.

On 21 February 2008 the Perm Regional Court amended the judgment, granting the claims in part. 7.

  It is contended by the applicant in this case that the decisions of the domestic courts striking out his claims in libel on the basis of an implied undertaking or on an immunity from suit deprived

  One group of cases originates in the case of König v.

There were also cases where the parent with care was sometimes in receipt of benefits and at other times not.

However, as the applicant had brought his case to the courts in 2003, his claim was time ‑ barred. 13.

FRANCAISE DES JEUX ayant son siège 126 rue Galliéni 92100 BOULOGNE BILLANCOURT représentée par la SCP ARNAUDY - BAECHLIN, avoués à la Cour assistée de Me Claire BERTHEUX-SCOTTE, avocat au barreau

Par arrêt du 29 novembre 2011, la Cour de cassation a cassé et annulé l'arrêt du 25 mai 2010 en ce qu'il a statué sur le point de départ des intérêts de retard et a débouté la société de ses demandes de

In the case of Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium (23 June 1981, §   45, Series   A no.

  In the case of Balakin v.

  In practice the first claim generally describes the main inventive idea and other claims, dependent thereon, describe particular embodiments of the invention.   33.

  The applicant claims that X runs a health club where SP works as a teacher and from which X gains a considerable income. The applicant believes that SP also claims income support.

It further points out that in several cases (see, in particular, König and Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere , both cited above; Benthem v. the Netherlands , 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97; and Feldbrugge

.-40530 LABENNE représenté par la SELARL BERQUET Mme Claude Y... née le 20 Janvier 1956 à MARSEILLE (13001) demeurant...-40530 LABENNE représentée par la SELARL BERQUET INTIMÉ M.

The applicant did not claim compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage. 59.     The Government contested the claim. 60.

In the case of Mecit and Others v.

VALLEIX, président et par Mme BERTHET, greffier, auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. I.

which came before it.