Aucune des pièces médicales jointes par le requérant à son mémoire du 14 décembre 2021 ne concluent enfin clairement à l'imputabilité même partielle de sa dépression à ses conditions de travail.

Sur le rapport de Mme Lanoue, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Delvolvé et Trichet, avocat de la société Soditec, de la SCP Thouvenin, Coudray et Grévy, avocat de M.

The Judicial Committee for officials of the Chamber of Deputies partly upheld the applicants’ claims; the administration appealed and requested a stay of execution of the decisions.

    As regards the applicants’ claims for loss of earnings, the Court reiterates that, under Rule 60 of the Rules of Court, any claim for just satisfaction must be itemised and submitted in writing

This provision was consolidated in the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“the 1992 Act”).

If state immunity is no answer to the claim under article 6 alone, then it is no answer to the claim under the combination of article 6 and article 14.

the Autonomous Organisation for Labour Housing (Autonomos Organismos Ergatikis Katoikias - hereafter OEK), the TEE and the Greek State.

For those reasons it rejected the second applicant's claim. 16.

In a judgment of 5 February 1999, the Civil Court rejected the applicant’s claims.

    The Government considered this claim to be excessive. 94.

(the Labour Department), seeking recalculation of benefits and payment of a lump sum due to him.

The applicant (a qualified and formerly practising barrister) was elected as a Member of Parliament (“MP”) for the Labour Party in 1992, and remained an MP until May 2010, having been re-elected in three

  In particular, the applicant was not informed of proceedings brought against him in 1991 as co-defendant before Labour Tribunal No. 7 of Valencia, which resulted in his being ordered in 1992 to

Chalnot, 54000 Nancy, 40 / de Mme Corinne Berlochet, demeurant 13, Boucle des Taillis, 57100 Volkrange, 41 / de Mme Agnès Bernard, demeurant 7 rue Georges Moreau, 55240 Bouligny, 42 / de Mme Corinne

    The first claim for a declaratory judgment 7 .

On 12 February 2019 the Debrecen Administrative and Labour Court quashed the authority’s decision and remitted the case to the authority.

They considered that this decision directly affected their civil rights in that their claims relating to their employment were reduced.

et 40-4 du règlement sanitaire départemental, relatifs à l'éclairement des pièces, et au respect d'une hauteur sous plafond d'une hauteur minimale de deux mètres, il n'est pas justifié que, par temps clair

As the debtor had failed to pay for the products made, the court upheld the undertaking’s claim.