CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780105
1 avril 2010
The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Dalia v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC006146216
8 janvier 2019
major importance when interpreted in the light of the Preamble to the Convention, which, in its relevant part, declares the rule of law to be part of the common heritage of the Contracting States (see Dacia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD005175210
14 mars 2017
have been Returned to their Owners, and on [Rented] Apartments ( Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas “ Dėl valstybės išperkamo iš savininkų turto bei sąvininkams sugrąžintų gyvenamųjų namų, jų dalių
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC005492715
19 juin 2018
complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see Vučković   and   Others , cited above, § 70, and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780405
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917JUD001622508
17 septembre 2015
The Court is also aware of the difficulties in calculating lost profits in circumstances where such profits could fluctuate owing to a variety of unpredictable factors (see Dacia S.R.L. v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223335
1 février 2023
objections lodged against those decisions, fulfil their obligation to provide relevant and sufficient grounds for the deprivation of liberty in question (see, in particular, Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524JUD001452103
24 mai 2011
Moldova , no. 12066/02, § 63, 19 June 2007). Furthermore, measures depriving a person of his liberty may often involve an inevitable element of suffering or humiliation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD000566304
29 janvier 2013
[GC], no. 57220/00, §   15, ECHR   2002 ‑ VIII, and Dalia v. France , no. 26102/95, § 38, ECHR   1998I). 49.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD003869121
11 décembre 2025
  Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC000346108
4 avril 2017
  the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, §   115, ECHR 2016).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC006516110
6 septembre 2011
Cristina 246)         Moldoveanu Mariana 247)         Morosan Alexandru Ionut 248)         Morosan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC004267016
5 septembre 2017
concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see Vučković and   Others , cited above, § 70, and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC000543317
14 novembre 2017
  the   Republic   of   Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, §   115, ECHR 2016).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0713JUD000184908
13 juillet 2017
included (see Stretch , cited above, § 47), it is also aware of the difficulties in calculating them in circumstances where such earnings could fluctuate owing to a variety of unpredictable factors (see Dacia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD000200009
6 avril 2017
    Consequently, the reparation should aim at putting the applicant in the position in which he or she would have found himself had the violation not occurred (see Dacia S.R.L. v.
Page 5 sur 5
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.