CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

612 résultats pour « Evelyne SKILLAS-MAYER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0623JUD004854299

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2005

23 juin 2005

If the debtor fails to comply with this obligation, further time-limits may be fixed and further fines may be imposed by a court.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD003975805

Admin. suprême

23 février 2012

23 février 2012

may not) present.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD008111417

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2020

13 octobre 2020

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ádám and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001892515

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2019

10 janvier 2019

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Wunderlich v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127DEC002790004

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2008

27 novembre 2008

skills.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0310DEC005533900

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2005

10 mars 2005

On 15 May 1997 the appellate prosecutor dismissed his appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1123DEC003374796

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 1999

23 novembre 1999

  “Potential existence of such liability may in many instances be in the general public interest, as tending towards the observance of a higher standard of care in the carrying on of various different

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD003728313

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2017

30 novembre 2017

Furthermore, the fourth applicant had stayed with the first applicant and X during the first days at the family centre, but had not noticed the first applicant’s lack of parenting skills, even though it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0506DEC000361319

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2025

6 mai 2025

For example, [a person’s] aggressive or expressly provocative behaviour [means that his or her opinion may] also be expressed in a similar manner’. [13.1] The judgment which was appealed against does not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186954

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2018

20 septembre 2018

On 29 May 2014 the applicant was transferred to a detention facility in Moscow.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1002DEC001413788

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 1989

2 octobre 1989

  He may seek an order of mandamus against a recalcitrant LEA.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000992912

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

Referring to the case of Zaunegger (cited above), he stated that every father should be able to apply to the domestic courts for shared parental authority, even if the mother was opposed to it, as that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD005094220

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2024

18 juillet 2024

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Djeri and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC001563315

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2016

11 octobre 2016

She had also criticised X for being too thin, for not speaking better Polish and for religious matters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001560102

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2008

18 mars 2008

Maybe quieter? M.P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC003890212

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.     The applicant is married and has children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0315DEC001190102

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2005

15 mars 2005

The complaint was dismissed on many occasions due to procedural shortcomings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD005644311

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

    Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 states: “(1) Everyone has the right to education.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003433302

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

It found that neither the manner in which the proceedings had so far been conducted nor the adjournment until 17 May 2001 had been in violation of the obligation to proceed speedily ( Beschleunigungsgrundsatz

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308DEC002408603

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2011

8 mars 2011

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle

Page 5 sur 31

← PrécédentSuivant →