Fougères, - les conclusions de Mme Bruneau, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Jablonski, substituant Me Sabattier, représentant la commune de Béthune.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Jablonka, a lawyer practising in Bratislava. The Slovak Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Pirošíková.

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

Jablonský, a lawyer practising in Prague; Mr Josef Krejčí, born in 1928 and residing in Čachtice; Mr Jiří Beran, born in 1945 and living in Prague; Ms Johanna Kammerlander, born in 1947 and living in Vienna

account of his state of health, the authorities when deciding whether a person should be released or detained are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jabloński

account of his state of health, the authorities when deciding whether a person should be released or detained are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jabloński

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Piou, - les conclusions de Mme Allart, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Jablonski, substituant Me Billard,

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR   2000 ‑ IV, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000). 2.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000). 2.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR   2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000). 2.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR   2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jabłoński v.   Poland , no.   33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000). B.

grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Jabłoński

ECHR 2003 ‑ I (extracts) When deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jabłonski

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Jablonský, avocat au barreau tchèque. Le gouvernement défendeur était représenté par son agent, M. V.A. Schorm. A.