Макіївки Донецької області ) ordered the State-owned Company “Mine Kirova” ( ДВАТ “шахта ім.   Кірова” ) to pay the applicant UAH   26,020 [1] in various compensations.

#xa0;   Fokinskiy District Court of Bryansk 30/06/2021 16/03/2021 30/06/2021     49635/21 08/11/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich BAKSHAYEV 1982     Sloboskoy District Court of the Kirov

He is currently serving his sentence in IK-20 in the settlement of Polevoy-2 in the Kirov region. The applicant’s family lives in the town of Zvenigovo in the Republic of Mari-El.

to warm water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food   12,500     77692/17 25/10/2017 Konstantin Vladimirovich MYSLIVCHIK 1980     IK-5 Kirov

    The Court notes at the outset that the present case is very similar to Kirilova and Others and Lazarov , cited above. 28.

food Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention     63151/19 15/06/2020 Mikhail Nikolayevich CHUB 1983       IK-29 Kirov

La position de la cour régionale de Kirov selon laquelle l’argument du requérant tiré de sa bonne foi lors de l’acquisition de la parcelle ne pouvait pas être pris en compte, conformément à l’article 302

no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities   6,300     61780/16 21/11/2016 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich Groshev 22/05/1990 IK-25 Kirov

    The applicant was born in 1950 and lives in Kirov. 5.

meghosszabbítását igazoló új információk közlésére vonatkozó kötelezettsége – Téves jogalkalmazás – Nyilvánvaló értékelési hiba – A tulajdonhoz való jog – Arányosság – Az ártatlanság vélelme – Jogellenességi kifogás

    The relevant domestic law and practice have been summarised in the Court’s judgment in the case of Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos.

Case Judgment of Final on 12739/05 GORANOVA-KARAENEVA 08/03/2011 08/06/2011 22373/04 HADZHIEV 23/10/2012 18/03/2013 5182/02 KIROV 22/05/2008 22/08/2008 27079/04 NATSEV 16/10/2012 16/01/2013 21480/03 GEORGI

December 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 75025/17 Vasilka Asenova UGRINOVA against Bulgaria lodged on 13 October 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application, of the type examined in Kirilova

of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 4,400   21901/20 05/03/2020 Ivan Viktorovich BERDNIKOV 1993 Pavlov Andrey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg IK-5 Kirov

    The relevant domestic law and practice have been summarised in the Court’s judgment in the case of Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos.

43278/98+ VELIKOVI AND OTHERS 15/03/2007 24/04/2008 09/07/2007 24/07/2008 3413/05 GEORGIEVA AND MUKAREVA 02/09/2010 02/12/2010 45116/98 KALINOVA 08/11/2007 27/11/2008 08/02/2008 27/02/2009 31836/04 KIROVA

    The case is of the type examined in Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 42908/98 and 3 others, 9 June 2005) and many follow-up cases (some of which are cited below).

    The case is of the type examined in Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 42908/98 and 3 others, 9 June 2005) and many follow-up cases (some of which are cited below).

effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings   61017/21 25/02/2022 Nikita Sergeyevich FEDOROV 1998     Pervomayskiy District Court of Kirov