expropriés en juin 1949 et attribués à d’autres personnes physiques en 1957, soit bien avant le 18 mars 1992, date à laquelle la Convention est entrée en vigueur à l’égard de la République tchèque ( Kuchař

Convention, since it is the function of the courts to determine disputes between parties, with the inevitable consequence that one party may ultimately be unsuccessful in the litigation in question (see Kuchař

France , (déc.), n o 43275/98, 11 mai 2000   ; Commission européenne des droits de l’homme, Kuchar et Stis   c.

Pologne , n o 24559/94, décision de la Commission du 6 septembre 1995, DR 82-B, p. 76   ; Kuchař et Štis c. République tchèque , (déc.), n o 37527/97, 23 mai 2000   ; Horvat c.

Poland , no. 24559/94, Commission decision of 6 September 1995, Decisions and Reports 82, p. 76, at p. 82, Kuchař and Štis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), 37527/97, 23 May 2000, Horvat v.

France (déc.), n o 43275/98, 11 mai 2000   ; Commission européenne des droits de l’homme, Kuchar et Stis c.   République   Tchèque (déc.), n o   37527/97, 21 octobre 1998). 54.

HR, Kuchar and Stis v.   Czech Republic (dec.), no.   37527/97, 21 October 1998; mutatis mutandis , see also S.Ö., A.K., Ar.K. and Y.S.P.E.H.V. v.   Turkey (dec.), no.

    20446/24* 28/06/2022 Anatoliy Vasylyovych DUDAR 1939       Private house (17.5 sq. m) at 6 Zarichchya St, Kukhari village, Ivankiv district, Kyiv region Allegedly destroyed

Indeed, it is the very function of the courts to determine such disputes, the regulation of which falls within the remit of domestic law and outside the scope of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Kuchar

  36112/24 18/07/2022 Nataliya Geniyivna DUDARSKA 1969       Private house (166.5 sq. m) at 23 Zarichchia (previously – Zhovtneva) St, Kukhari village, Vyshhorod district, Kyiv region

Ivan Danilovich TERLETSKIY 19/12/1955 Krykhivtsi   Milytary Local Court of Ivano-Frankivsk Garrison, 14.11.2002 Not enforced   5989/13 14/01/2013 Vasyl Oleksiyovych LUKYANENKO 27/09/1939 Kukhari

Poland , no. 24559/94, Commission decision of 6 September 1995, Decisions and Reports 82, p. 76, at p. 82, Kuchař and Štis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), 37527/97, 23 May 2000, Horvat v.

expropriated in June 1949 and assigned to other natural persons in 1957, that is long before 18 March 1992, the date of the entry into force of the Convention with regard to the Czech Republic (see Kuchař

2001, less than six months after 26 June 2001, the applicant’s complaint under Article   5   §   1   (c) of the Convention cannot be dismissed as lodged out of time (see Nikolay Kuchere

system, provided a forum for the determination of such a private-law dispute does not give rise to an interference by the State with property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, for example, Kuchař

  1 ( Kuchař and Štis v.   the Czech Republic (dec.), no.

consequence that one party may ultimately be unsuccessful in the litigation in question (see, amongst a number of authorities, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 43, ECHR 2002 VIII; Kuchar