margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }   Communicated on 6 February 2019   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 30640/09 Imanzade Alisultan Gizi MAMMADOVA

    The fourth applicant, Mr Sardar Mammadov, was arrested at his home on 18 October 2003 and taken to the OCD (see Mammadov v.

GURBANOV and Nadir MAMMADOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 26 February 2013 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Mr Mammad Gurbanov (the first applicant) and Mr   Nadir Mammadov (the second applicant

By letters dated 28 April 2016, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on 22 March 2016 and that no extension

German investigative authorities decrypted and sifted through the transferred data and conducted further investigative measures to identify the senders and recipients of the text messages exchanged over

(“the applicants”), on various dates in 2011 (see Appendix). 2.

They were born on various dates and live in Baku (see Appendix for all details). They are represented before the Court by Ms Sevinj Aliyeva, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan.

They are represented before the Court by various lawyers practising in Azerbaijan (see Appendix). The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

the police officers entering the building in which the applicant resided and, subsequently, had seen them taking him to the police car. 6.

    For a summary of other relevant provisions of the CAO see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 33-38, 15 October 2015) . THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 28.

against Azerbaijan lodged on 21 July 2014 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicant, Mr Omar Mammadov, is an Azerbaijani national, who was born in 1995 and lives in Baku.

The applicant was sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declaration several weeks before the date of this decision.

The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision. The Court has not received any response from the applicants.

    Having regard to the facts of the present case and their clear similarity to those of the Gafgaz Mammadov case on all relevant and crucial points, the Court sees no particular circumstances

The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision.

The present application was lodged on its behalf by Mr Anar Mammadli who was its chairman.   2 .

  In the case of Mammadli v.

However, it appears that the appeal was not actually sent owing to negligence on the part of the prison administration. 13.

By letter dated 14 May 2025, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired