Article 3 : L'Etat versera à la SAS Grand Cassiet la somme de 1 500 euros au titre de l'article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative.

[L] s'est présenté sciemment au domicile de son ex-maîtresse, qui avait rompu avec lui, pour en découdre avec son mari ; - la mère de M.

2018 and 5 March 2018 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The case concerns the alleged insufficient reasoning provided in domestic courts’ decisions authorising secret surveillance measures against

  79065/13, §§ 119-122, 13 March 2023), was the investigation in the present case, as carried out by the Serbian authorities, in breach of Article   2 of the Convention?   2.

of ritual slaughter carried out by ritual slaughterers authorised by an approved religious body.

The present case concerns the strip-searches carried out on 4 February 2003, 10   February 2003, 5 March 2003, 12 March 2003, 20 March 2003, 18 April 2003, 24   April 2003, 28 April 2003, 1 May

On 30 March 2001 the applicant urged action on her request. 7.     Measurements were carried out on 1 May 2001 at night by an independent expert firm.

septembre 2002, qui a condamné, les deux premiers, pour prise illégale d'intérêts, à 15.000 euros d'amende, et le troisième, pour atteinte à la liberté d'accès et à l'égalité des candidats dans les marchés

The case was remitted for additional check to the Novozybkovsky OVD. It is not clear whether the forensic medical examination was carried out. C.     Court proceedings 1.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Commission’s report of 4   March 2010 stated that the applicant’s diagnostics and diagnosis had been correct, the hysterectomy had been carried out in accordance with the relevant procedures and

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

François, - LA SOCIETE COOPERATIVE UNION AGRICOLE COMTOISE, partie intervenante, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de BESANCON, chambre correctionnelle, du 13 mars 1997, qui, pour apposition d'appellation

2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 47448/20 Yakup ASLANTEPE against Türkiye and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 5 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Fort-de-France, 18 mars 2005), que la société Résidence Prestige

On 30   March 2021 the prosecutor amended the indictment, arguing that “during 2008 the applicant had carried out unlawful excavation and had unlawfully constructed a retaining wall on his plot.”

  Particular circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Between 25 February and 31 March 2022 the applicants were detained in the premises of the Chornobyl NPP.

In the case of Vallesinella S.a.s. v.