CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

147 résultats pour « Patricia COURTHEOUX »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD001975318

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

Similar finding was reached by the Court in respect of the practice of confinement of defendants in metal cages at remand prisons for the purposes of their participation in court hearings carried out via

Page 5 sur 8

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD003721302

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

    On 16, 17 and 18 January 2002 the investigator ordered the applicant's transfer to the Severodvinsk Town temporary detention ward for participation in certain investigative actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111864

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2012

13 juin 2012

The applicant was not brought to the courthouse.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110118

Admin. suprême

8 février 2012

8 février 2012

Many were barred from approaching the courthouse which was cordoned off by the police. Later, during the proceedings, eight journalists were allowed in at the applicant’s insistent requests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC003018011

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2019

26 mars 2019

As there was still no electricity at the courthouse, the court asked the parties whether the hearing should be adjourned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603JUD000300907

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

The participation in a hearing of a defence lawyer called upon by the defendant or appointed by the court is mandatory (Article 247 § 6). THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0729JUD000393304

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2010

29 juillet 2010

    Criminal proceedings against the applicant on a charge of robbery and the use of force by escorts in the courthouse 79.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD003694102

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2009

23 avril 2009

No food (hot meal or dry ration) was served to the applicant in the courthouse. On such days the applicant was also deprived of outside walks and showers. 52.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126720

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2013

3 septembre 2013

According to him, at least on fifty occasions he was taken from the detention facility to the courthouse to take part in hearings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD005579220

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2024

12 décembre 2024

The Government also submitted that records concerning the applicant’s participation in investigative measures were incomplete.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD000538610

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2022

24 mars 2022

    A court could examine material or written evidence outside the courthouse if such evidence could not or was difficult to be brought to the courthouse (Articles 79 and 202). 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD003039506

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

    On 8 December 2005 the Tverskoy District Court found the applicants and their co-defendants guilty of participation in mass disorders.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0216JUD002723605

Admin. suprême

16 février 2016

16 février 2016

Article 155.1: Participation in the hearing by means of a video-conference [1] “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224300

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – the applicant was convicted twice for participation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD004705016

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

He further submitted that his defence counsel had not been able to keep copies of the material from the case file and had been able to study it only in a specially assigned office of the courthouse.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2378868-2568690

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2008

6 juin 2008

In February 1993 he was arrested and placed in pre-trial detention for active participation in various acts of terrorism. He was released in October 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD000324203

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2010

21 décembre 2010

In such cases a medical examination should include a general medical check-up and additional methods of testing, if necessary, with the participation of particular medical specialists.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3119111-3477317

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2010

12 mai 2010

Sentenced to 16 years in prison for the alleged participation in a murder committed in 1997, he complains of the unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him, in particular that the domestic courts

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2523990-2739454

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2008

23 octobre 2008

courts’ refusal to grant the applicants leave to appear at the hearings concerning their civil claim had been prejudicial, no legal possibilities having been considered to ensure their effective participation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202DEC002964708

Admin. suprême

2 février 2010

2 février 2010

The case management conference therefore took place without their participation.

Source officielle