The Auditor gave a press conference that same day in which he made public his findings.

matter, that the complaint was essentially the same as the one addressed in application no. 4505/05 and that the applicant lacked victim status.

  Government’s preliminary objection (application inadmissible on account of friendly settlement reached before Commission in connection with an earlier application concerning length of same proceedings

June 2015 and 14 July 2015 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern a single set of administrative tax proceedings which was later severed in two parallel sets, both of which lasted

Further charges of a similar nature were brought in July 1992 and October 1993 and in March 1995 the District Court decided to deal with all the charges in the same proceedings.

The first concerned the divorce action brought before the court of first instance in March 1998 and the second, which was brought at the same time, concerned the provisional measures in respect of which

  Government’s preliminary objection (application inadmissible on account of friendly settlement reached before Commission in connection with an earlier application concerning length of same proceedings

As to the merits the civil proceedings to be taken into consideration had lasted two years, four months and twenty-four days.

  His appeal was refused by the same body on 15 May 1992.   The applicant applied for a judicial review.

Law – Article 6 § 1: The proceedings, which had lasted for approximately thirteen years and eight months over three levels of jurisdiction, had been excessively long and in breach of the “reasonable-time

On that date, however, the proceedings had already lasted for some two and a half years.

He had already been admitted on several occasions to the same hospital due to his mental disability which was aggravated by an addiction to alcohol and drugs.

The search lasted until late at night and was resumed in the morning of 27   August 2009.

As the applicants in that case, and being represented by the same lawyer, the applicant in the present case invokes almost all Convention provisions, complaining about the adopted measures in so far as

The applicants complain that the proceedings have lasted an unreasonably long time.

It thus lasted more than seven years at two levels of jurisdiction. Admissibility 15.

    The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against her lasted unreasonably long.

He further complains under the same provision that he has been confined in a metal cage during the court hearings on 17, 30 and 31 May, 1 and 12 June 2017, 18 January, 18 March and 15 May 2018.

On the same day the prosecutor authorised his detention on remand.