On 8 May 1991 the Łańcut District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) gave a decision declaring that the first, second, tenth and thirteenth applicants and their siblings had acquired their late father's estate and

sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 23208/05 by Mirsad MEŠIĆ and Others against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

The Court of Appeal subsequently ordered that the retrial should be conducted by a judge sitting alone without a jury in view of the very significant danger of jury tampering.

. # Præjudiciel anmodning - Fælles Toldtarif - dele til et elektrisk apparat til sikring mod butikstyveri. # Sag 57/85.

#Social sikring - tillægsydelse fra Fonds national de solidarité - mulighed for at få ikke-bidragspligtige ydelser tildelt eller udbetalt i et andet land.#Sag C-236/88.

. # Hessische Knappschaft contre Maison Singer et fils. # Demande de décision préjudicielle: Cour d'appel de Colmar - France. # Affaire 44-65.

#Hessische Knappschaft contro Maison Singer et fils.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Cour d'appel de Colmar - Francia.#Causa 44-65.

The Government submitted that Constitutional Court Judge L.Đ. had been exempted from sitting in that case precisely because she had previously acted in this case.

Les trois moteurs ont été directement livrés à la société Sillinger par la société Brunswick laquelle les a mis en route et programmés ; la vérification du montage a été réalisée par la société Sillinger

Demandeur (s) : SILLINGER [Adresse 1] Mer N° SIREN : 431 546 233 Représentant (s) : SCP VERBATEAM AVOCATS Défendeur (s) : TRANSCANAUX (SAS) [Adresse 2] N° SIREN : 821 310 711 Représentant(s) : SCP SVA

On 20 January 2015 the second-instance court, sitting in private, dismissed the applicant’s appeal and upheld the detention order.

inline-block } .s5A070004 { width:213.96pt; display:inline-block }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 47946/11 Hüseyin YORGUN against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting

:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 35049/03 by Władysława KLESZCZ against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 55808/07 by Ludwik NOWOSIELSKI against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 26803/07 by Aleksandra KRASZEWSKA-SZEFER against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 41771/02 by Eugeniusz MACH against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

#Social sikring - særregler for anvendelsen af den nederlandske lovgivning om almindelig alderdomsforsikring - bopælsbegrebet.#Sag C-282/91.

On 17 June 2009 the Iaşi   County Court, sitting as a bench of two judges, dismissed the applicant’s appeal on the merits.

The psychological situation of C indicates that he should stay in the care of his father and have relations with his siblings.