CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

127 résultats pour « Suryana MASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD004020923

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2026

22 janvier 2026

Nevertheless, it concluded that the point made by the lower court, although questionable, had had no impact on the essence of its reasoning, which had led it to the correct conclusion that the applicants

Page 5 sur 7

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514JUD002181003

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2009

14 mai 2009

The explosive devices had been home-made and probably radio-controlled. 47 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD001797207

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

By a letter of 21 October 2010, the Court was informed that their heirs (Roberto Arras, Mirella Arras and Regina Obbino in respect of Mr Arras, and Giorgio Dessi, Loredana Dessi, Susanna Dessi, Alessio

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:SO01354

Cassation

9 juillet 2014

9 juillet 2014

MOYENS ANNEXES au présent arrêt Moyens produits par la SCP Masse-Dessen, Thouvenin et Coudray, avocat aux Conseils, pour Mme X....

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004169407

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2014

1 juillet 2014

It makes no difference whether the public prosecutor has learnt of the incident from a criminal complaint filed by the victim or another person, or indeed even if he has only heard rumours to that effect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163082

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2016

25 avril 2016

It would appear that an application has been made to legalise the illegal constructions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC000686105

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

After failing to reach a friendly settlement, with letters of different dates set out in the appendix, the respondent Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD002278206

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

The court referred to Article 1069 of the Civil Code of Russia which made the State liable only for damage caused by its agents’ unlawful actions.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 4 - Chambre 7

5fdad7a2c4120a6a401586a4

Appel

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

supporte un second pavillon d'une superficie de 191 m² comprenant un sous-sol, un rez-de-chaussée et un étage ; en fond de parcelle se trouve un garage et à l'avant du pavillon, dans le jardin, une marre

Source officielle
TJ

8ème chambre

67f6cd4da9d5adc2606231ea

T. Judiciaire

7 avril 2025

7 avril 2025

ZURICH INSURANCE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (ZURICH IN SURANCE PLC) ZURICH en qualité d’assureur de la société BETOM INGENIERIE suivant polices n°7400022589 et 77005788000 , Société MUTUELLE DES ARCHITECTES

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD006541601

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

Reference was made to a negative assessment of the applicant’s performance and behaviour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317DEC002024406

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2016

17 mars 2016

  Président ANNEXE No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   20244/06 14/04/2006 Salvatore PALMERINI 20/03/1959 Viareggio (LU) Giunio MASSA  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD000422502

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

against the Republic of Slovenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Slovenian national, Ms Suzana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD001692408

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2011

19 juillet 2011

However, in the Sultana case, the Court had already held that the right to lodge a similar remedy had no features of private law and thus had no elements which could make it akin to a “civil” right, which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607DEC005150613

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2016

7 juin 2016

    The applicants, Ms Suzana Orel (“the first applicant”), Mr Mislav Orel (“the second applicant”) and Mr Silvio Orel (“the third applicant”) are Croatian nationals who were born in 1966, 1995

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD003852802

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2006

27 avril 2006

against the Republic of Slovenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Slovenian national, Ms Suzana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0218DEC001600290

Admin. suprême

18 février 1992

18 février 1992

W. had confessed having sold 3gr. of heroin to the applicant and the trial court based its conviction on this confession and not on the statement eventually made by the applicant as a witness;   &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD001627613

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 28   February 2013 by an Azerbaijani national, Ms Suraya

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323JUD000907407

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2010

23 mars 2010

It is not clear as to who is to make the legal interpretation of the municipal CTP decision. (...)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118DEC000686105

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2014

18 novembre 2014

After failing to reach a friendly settlement, with letters of different dates set out in the appendix, the respondent Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with

Source officielle