CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
cr
6137260ccd580146774228d1
28 juin 2000
judiciaire relevant d'un autre service, le mandat strict qui leur avait été délivré ; qu'en s'adjoignant des officiers de police judiciaire de la brigade du proxénétisme, les officiers de police judiciaire
Page 5 sur 3737
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD004646616
8 octobre 2019
Another police officer had also been present on the television programme (at the request of the Commissioner of Police “CoP”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD003771597
4 mai 2001
This complaint was investigated by an assistant chief constable, under the supervision of the Independent Commission for Police Complaints (the ICPC), as a result of which the Inspector concerned was given
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1011DEC002294793
11 octobre 1994
According to her account she was questioned about her applications to the Commission. The police had in their possession files relating to these applications.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD000176623
22 octobre 2024
such application shall be appointed for hearing with urgency and the application together with the date of the hearing shall be served on the same day of the application on the applicant and on the Commissioner
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404DEC002474694
4 avril 2000
In a later statement, it was announced that the Independent Commission for Police Complaints (the ICPC) would supervise the RUC investigation.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002564294
29 avril 1999
The respondents in the action – the Commissioner of Police, the acting registrar, the Attorney-General and the Prime Minister – appealed to the Constitutional Court. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002474694
In a later statement, it was announced that the Independent Commission for Police Complaints (the ICPC) would supervise the RUC investigation. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0629DEC002552694
29 juin 1998
Each interview took place in the presence of a representative of the ICPC (Independent Commission for Police Complaints) who also put questions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD005535212
23 juillet 2013
On 29 February 2012 the Principal Immigration Officer (who in effect was the Commissioner of Police) filed a response. He agreed with the facts as presented by the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD005855909
16 juillet 2013
On 8 January 1998 the RUC began an investigation supervised by the Independent Commission for Police Complaints (“ICPC”). 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0402JUD006267616
2 avril 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD005526300
9 janvier 2003
On 27 January 1999 the applicant's lawyer, who had been instructed by the applicant to file the constitutional case, requested that the Commissioner of Police, as Principal Immigration Officer, be ordered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC004611999
28 février 2002
The note was distributed to the Prosecutor General ( Rigsadvokaten ), the State Prosecutors (Statsadvokaterne ), the National Commissioner of Police ( Rigspolitichefen ) and the various police districts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0318DEC007527401
18 mars 2004
The Attorney General and the Commissioner of Police filed a memorandum in which they applied for the applicant's complaints to be dismissed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0407JUD007527401
7 avril 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC004504998
11 septembre 2001
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis ([1998] 2 WLR 401), the Court of Appeal applied the “public conscience test” to determine whether ex turpi causa , or an analogous rule of public policy, would
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC001909020
23 mars 2021
Any such application shall be appointed for hearing with urgency and together with the date of the hearing shall be served on the same day of the application on the Commissioner of Police or, as the case
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0421JUD001195607
21 avril 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830JUD004693112
30 août 2016
This is so because as explained in the case of Emanuel Ciantar, vs Commissioner of Police, Constitutional Court, judgment of 2 November 2001: ‘The principle is always that constitutional