CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0126JUD005947411
26 janvier 2016
Article 5 § 3 of the Convention cannot be seen as authorising pre-trial detention unconditionally provided that it lasts no longer than a certain period.
Page 5 sur 45955
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0531JUD002339505
31 mai 2012
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)
1 / 4 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007667288
4 mars 1983
DES PRIX AU PROFIT DE LA SOCIETE REQUERANTE.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD004428612
20 juillet 2017
No justification was provided at any point in time as to why it had not been possible to release him during the pre-trial investigation or the trial. 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD004208011
15 janvier 2015
Following the quashing of his conviction on 11 February 2014, the pre-trial detention resumed and continued until his release on 28 July 2014.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000602505
9 juillet 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD005052008
The pre-trial investigation and the criminal trial had been unreasonably drawn out, due to the subjective approach taken by the investigator. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD004057308
27 novembre 2014
He was re-arrested on 11 November 2005 and stayed in pre-trial detention until his conviction on 29 April 2010. His pre-trial detention, therefore, consisted of two separate periods. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD004029823
3 avril 2025
The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long. They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD006024913
11 octobre 2016
The Government also submitted that the applicant’s pre-trial detention comprised two non-consecutive periods.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD000596909
On 17 August 2012 the court held to place him in pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD002208321
22 janvier 2026
The applicant complained that her pre-trial detention had been unjustified.
5 / 3 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007684561
2 février 1979
DE L'ORDONNANCE DU 30 JUIN 1945, NOTAMMENT DE SON ARTICLE 2 RELATIVE AUX PRIX, COMPETENCE A ETE ATTRIBUEE AUX PREFETS POUR FIXER, PAR ARRETE, LES PRIX DES PRODUITS ET SERVICES LORSQUE CES PRIX "NE FONT
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000999406
21 juin 2016
The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had not been based on sufficient reasons and that it had been unreasonably long.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD005492909
Period of pre-trial detention 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001JUD000195606
1 octobre 2013
only summary reasoning for keeping him in pre-trial detention.
Conseil d'État
CETAT:CETATEXT000007643386
5 mai 1971
. - PRIX. - PRIX GLOBAL ET FORFAITAIRE..* ABSENCE DE DROIT A INDEMNITE EN L'ABSENCE DE PRESCRIPTIONS ABUSIVES D'UN ORDRE DE SERVICE.
CETAT:CETATEXT000007610854
19 décembre 1966
. - ELEMENTS DU PRIX DE VENTE TAXABLES. - Assiette des taxes - Ventes en gros, au détail - Prix normal de vente en gros.
CETAT:CETATEXT000007608086
22 février 1965
. - ELEMENTS DU PRIX DE VENTE TAXABLES. - Assiette des taxes - Commissionnaires - Commissionnaire facturant à ses clients un prix forfaitaire de transport.
3 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007756356
13 décembre 1989
: "Les prix de tous les produits et services sont et demeurent bloqués, soit au niveau qu'ils avaient atteint au 1er septembre 1939, soit au niveau qui résulte des décisions prises depuis cette date"