Furthermore, he was unable to work because he had been suspended from driving, and he had been forced to sell his apartment in order to be able to live.

On that date the hearing was adjourned until 21 June 1991 and then (because one of the defendants had not submitted a defence) until 13 November 1991 and thereafter until 28   February 1992 (because

Mr K. was absent because of a business trip. 24 .     On 26 February 2002 a hearing was postponed because of the applicant's illness. 25 .

On 23 July 2012 the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court stated that the complaint was not subject to examination by the courts dealing with administrative procedure because it involved the examination

  Law : The Government’s request for the application to be struck out of the list because the owner of the building in dispute had died : (a)     Allowed in respect of the owner’s son: At

  (g) Is the fairness of the criminal proceedings against C.O. seriously called into question because of the impugned statements?   2.

The applicants rejected this offer, mainly because they did not wish to change the neighbourhood and because the new flat was, in their view, of a worse quality.

On 2   March 1995 the hearing was again adjourned because of the absence of the applicant’s counsel.

The court added that the invoices could be not considered false because they had been issued for services which had really been provided.

  In his request he explained how he wished to cease production at Ötz because it was situated some 100 kilometres from Mäder, he was unable to run both sites himself and because the tenant who had

On 10   April 2000 the district court adjourned the execution because the agency had complained about the bailiff.

It took into consideration that the law on concurrence of criminal offences applied because of other offences the applicant had been convicted of after 2013 and it reduced the sentence by a year because

It was rejected on 1   December 2020 because she had failed to substantiate any objective risk for her or for the child.

. # Behoud van rechten door werknemers bij overgang van ondernemingen. # Zaak 24/85.

#Kort geding - Lid van het Europees Parlement - Terugvordering van toelagen betaald als vergoeding van kosten voor parlementaire bijstand en reiskosten - Verzoek om opschorting van tenuitvoerlegging -

. # Behoud van rechten van werknemers bij overgang van onderneming. # Zaak C-392/92.

I did not have the required professional or scientific qualities and [because] I was inexpert.” 13.

The court refused to examine it because it had no basis in law. 29.

proceedings should be struck out because their continuation would contravene Article 30 § 2 of the Constitution.