On 16   November 2020 the prison authorities informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 4   January 2020.

On 27 July 2023 a letter sent by the Registry to the applicant’s attention was returned by the post on the grounds that it could not be delivered because the applicant had died and his family refused to

    By letter of 23 May 2013, the Government informed the Registry that the applicant had died in detention on 31 July 2010. THE LAW 5.

On 9 March 2023 the Government informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 7 June 2022 and asked the Court to strike the application out of his list of cases since no heirs, close family members

On 30 January 2025 the applicant’s lawyer informed the Court that the applicant had died on 27 July 2020 and that his widow, Mrs Mariia Savruk wished to pursue the application.

On 28   March 2018 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that his application to the Court would not be pursued.

On 9   January 2020 the Government submitted observations and informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 2 November 2016 and requested the Court to strike-out the application in virtue of

On   1   April 2014, after numerous trial rounds and the eventual remittal of the case for further pre-trial investigation, B.T. died.

On 3 January 2025 the Government informed the Registry that the   applicant had died on 8 September 2024.

On 1 June 2015 the Government sent to the Registry a letter notifying the Court that the applicant died on 23 March 2010 and requesting to strike out the application from the list of cases, since in five

Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) On 22   May 2019 the Government informed the Registry that the applicant had died

On 24 July 2023 a letter sent by the Registry to the applicant’s attention was returned by the post on the grounds that it could not be delivered because the applicant had died.

On 28   October 2019 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that applicant had died. She did not specify that the application to the Court would be pursued by any heir.

mail that was sent to the applicant by the Court was returned to the Registry, containing the postal service provider’s note that the delivery of the mail had been impossible because the addressee had died

On 13   July 2021 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died; he did not indicate that the applicant had had any heirs who would wish to pursue the application

On 4 February 2020 the Government informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 16 April 2019.

He was taken to a hospital where he died on 27 July 2015 from the injuries sustained. On the same day criminal proceedings into the P.’s death were instituted.

    By a letter dated 7 August 2017 the applicant’s lawyer informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 15 May 2014. No heirs presented themselves to pursue the application.

According to a report, his health suddenly deteriorated at 4.30 a.m. and he was taken to hospital, where he died at about 5.15 a.m. Criminal proceedings were instituted.

In its view, the victim, who was regarded as a suspect, had died after warning shots had been fired during the operation in question.