CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD002883419
12 septembre 2023
Released victims have also been banned from leaving Chechnya and threatened with intimidation to deter them and their families from filing criminal complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD007399001
15 juillet 2010
On the same date the court also adopted an interim decision by which it froze the accounts of the applicant company and banned any transactions with the first applicant's property and apartment over UAH
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD006026211
20 juillet 2017
France , 26 April 1991, § 35, Series A no. 202; Kasparov and Others v. Russia , no. 21613/07, §§ 82-83, 3   October 2013; and Kudrevičius and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD002390903
1 février 2011
    On 21 January 2003 the Izmir State Security Court ordered the applicant's release pending trial but banned him from leaving Turkey. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD003279407
15 décembre 2015
  France [GC], no. 34044/02, § 77, ECHR 2010; Skibińscy v. Poland , no.   52589/99, § 73, 14 November 2006; and Potomska and Potomski v.   Poland , cited above, § 61). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD000283313
10 juin 2021
Inspections carried out in 2003 and 2006 had expressly banned passengers who were being carried during navigation from accessing and using the open deck benches until the stability of the boat had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD004298913
16 février 2017
Page 50 sur 50
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.