Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0527DEC005087599
27 mai 2003
27 mai 2003
As the CT scan carried out shortly after the accident had revealed no signs of brain injury, the applicant had failed to prove that he was suffering from a brain injury caused by the accident.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179484
22 novembre 2017
22 novembre 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC003097811
3 juillet 2018
3 juillet 2018
Subsequently both cases were joined. 7.
Source officiellecomm
6137214bcd580146773f29b4
18 décembre 1990
18 décembre 1990
NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Mme Colette X..., demeurant château Vannières à La Cadière
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4484
29 janvier 2004
29 janvier 2004
In March 2002 the Cabinet decided that the gold mine could continue to operate.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55723
4 mars 1999
4 mars 1999
36pt; font-size:10pt } .s47E2B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt } INTERI M resolution DH (99) 245 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 25 MAY 1998 IN THE CASE
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204271
8 juillet 2020
8 juillet 2020
2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, a civil servant, was the director of a social care home for adults with mental disorders.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12304
11 décembre 2018
11 décembre 2018
At 8.20 p.m. the female applicant, who was in her 36th week of pregnancy, gave birth at home, allegedly owing to the stress caused by the search.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177242
30 août 2017
30 août 2017
In particular: - Was the interference in the present case “prescribed by law”?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243809
19 mai 2025
19 mai 2025
The applicant alleges that the domestic courts failed to properly address and provide reasons regarding a blood test report which, he claimed, was decisive for the outcome of the case.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164415
31 mai 2016
31 mai 2016
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247887
1 décembre 2025
1 décembre 2025
On 24 March 2021 the applicants married in Munich, Germany.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-572
22 février 2011
22 février 2011
No. 139 March 2011 Gauer and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242509
27 février 2025
27 février 2025
2025 THIRD SECTION Application no. 11645/20 Alma BRATI against Albania lodged on 20 February 2020 communicated on 27 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5200
20 mars 2003
20 mars 2003
51 March 2003 R.L. and M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC000728507
22 mars 2016
22 mars 2016
The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219368
2 septembre 2022
2 septembre 2022
font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 19 September 2022 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 12431/22 Vladimír VESELÝ against the Czech Republic lodged on 17 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202833
7 mai 2020
7 mai 2020
The case concerns the alleged routine monitoring of his correspondence with prosecution authorities, the Ombudsman and the Court during his detention in the Gorodyshche prison between 18 October
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126523
26 août 2013
26 août 2013
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 26 February 2008 the applicant was arrested in Van.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226254
10 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
The decision was notified to the applicant on 1 March 2018.
Source officiellePage 50 sur 819