AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC004945399
18 octobre 2005
18 octobre 2005
An administrative court shall hold an oral hearing if a private party so requests.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC006220200
8 novembre 2005
8 novembre 2005
However, the recorded telephone conversation had been of a private character and it had been obtained illegally.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD002217506
3 novembre 2009
3 novembre 2009
The court found that there had been no justification for publishing the name of a private person such as the applicant. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212DEC002275203
12 décembre 2006
12 décembre 2006
According to the postal slip, the applicant received the letter sent to his private address. However, he did not reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120DEC003074202
20 janvier 2004
20 janvier 2004
Section 38 paragraph 1 of the Act on Judicial Procedure in Administrative Matters provides that an oral hearing must be held if requested by a private party.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1106DEC003667297
6 novembre 2001
6 novembre 2001
The applicants complain under Article 8 of the Convention that Mehmet Kurnaz was deprived of his right to respect for his private and family life because he was ill-treated.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0517JUD006599801
17 mai 2005
17 mai 2005
She sued a private company which had constructed a building on her plot of land.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015DEC005197599
15 octobre 2002
15 octobre 2002
, on 29 October 1998, the Chief Enforcement Officer ( kihlakunnanvouti, häradsfogden ) of Valkeakoski granted the applicant’s further postponement request in order to enable him to organise certain private
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC006400700
14 mars 2006
14 mars 2006
The applicant was employed with a private limited liability company D (“the company”) which was wholly owned and managed by a private individual, Mr D (“the owner”).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD004773899
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202JUD000287202
2 décembre 2008
2 décembre 2008
731/1999), which provides that everyone’s right to private life is guaranteed. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD006220200
19 décembre 2006
19 décembre 2006
It was controlled by the State through the National Privatisation Agency ( Fond národného majetku – “the FNM”). 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015DEC004430698
15 octobre 2002
15 octobre 2002
The new town centre of Washington is known as the Galleries and is located within an area now owned by Postel Properties Limited (“Postel”), a private company.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-707011-716180
25 février 2003
25 février 2003
had been: ● a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the first applicant; and ● a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3046321-3364973
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
They relied on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD003564810
19 octobre 2023
19 octobre 2023
Waste management in Campania and in the municipalities of Caserta and San Nicola La Strada From 1994 to 2009 5 .
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cb19bd3db21cbdd8cd60
9 septembre 2008
9 septembre 2008
ARRÊT N° 534 RG : 08 / 00495 TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE PRIVAS 31 janvier 2008 FÉDÉRATION DES MSA ARDÈCHE LOIRE C / CHSCT DE LA MSA ARDÈCHE COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES CHAMBRE CIVILE 1re
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004430698
6 mai 2003
6 mai 2003
No judicial review would lie against the decision of such a private entity. 55.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD003706006
28 septembre 2010
28 septembre 2010
In relation to the applicant’s private life, he observed that the regulations were not directed at her private life. Any link between them would be as tenuous in the extreme.
Source officiellecomm
613723b7cd5801467740d489
9 janvier 2001
9 janvier 2001
d'un arrêt rendu le 18 novembre 1997 par la cour d'appel de Bastia (chambre civile), au profit : 1 / de Mme Paule, Michèle X..., épouse Z..., demeurant ... au Chanvre, 63160 Billom, 2 / de Mme Nicole
Source officiellePage 50 sur 283