CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC003670113

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2019

10 décembre 2019

They cared about their children, regularly visited them in the relevant State institutions, and brought clothes, toys, fruit and sweets to them.

Page 50 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0513DEC002342394

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1996

13 mai 1996

       As to Article 3, they consider that the subjection of them and their families to the experience of an armed attack and the experience of being forced to flee for their lives

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD001889305

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2010

20 avril 2010

They had then heard their father begging the soldiers to release him but that the soldiers had shot and killed him. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-357

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

The brokers then signed a deed assigning to the applicant company any claims they might have against the Netherlands State under Article   6 of the Convention as a result of their being denied access

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0410JUD001325202

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2008

10 avril 2008

They also complained that the officers concerned had used force to extract confessions from some of them concerning their involvement in the fight with Z.S.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0728JUD007430701

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 2009

28 juillet 2009

In this connection, they referred to their medical reports. 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0621JUD006181100

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2005

21 juin 2005

    On 16 April 1999 the judge rapporteur asked the Regional Court and the Land Office to forward their case files, which they did. 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140719

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2014

8 janvier 2014

They found out that the shops were closed in Cizre as there was a demonstration being held in the city centre.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0301DEC003714612

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2016

1 mars 2016

In its assessment of these guarantees the Migration Office took into account that they had been provided by the OPGRF and that there was no indication that they would not be effective in North Ossetia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622JUD005183999

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2006

22 juin 2006

1999 to the court, there is no material in the case file which would demonstrate that they maintained their allegations before the Istanbul State Security Court after 28 April 1999. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC005806813

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

There is no indication that they requested the enforcement proceedings to be suspended pending the examination of their supervisory review application. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0106DEC004215314

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

They also complained that this lack of effective investigation over all these years, and the trauma following the discovery of the bodies, caused them suffering in violation of Articles 3 and 8 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142507

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2014

17 mars 2014

They telephoned their superior Kh. for instructions. Kh. told them to find out which of the flats the man had entered and whether there was someone in flat no. 86.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD001687003

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

In their later joint observations the applicants added that an officer of the State Border Guard Service had told them that they would have an hour to go home on condition that they signed the records

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0927JUD001248986

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 1990

27 septembre 1990

the officers from their duty of secrecy in this respect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155539

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2015

27 mai 2015

They contended that the reasons for their detention had not been specified in the decision to detain them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0402JUD002113509

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2015

2 avril 2015

Having checked their passports, the men pulled sacks over their heads and put them in one of the APCs. 9 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0713JUD000873779

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1983

13 juillet 1983

keep abreast of this task without there being detrimental effects on the quality of the handling of cases and, at the end of the day, on protection under the law."

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1129JUD001274287

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1991

29 novembre 1991

This meant that Pine Valley were excluded from the benefit of the section, for they had exercised their constitutional right to litigate the validity of the planning permission in the Courts".

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3208929-3616770

Admin. suprême

27 août 2010

27 août 2010

They also complain that there is no prospect for them in the foreseeable future to be able to use, sell, bequeath, mortgage or develop their property as the Armenian Government continues to refuse to allow

Source officielle