and that his wife and friends had been at the airport waiting for him.

According to his medical records, the hospital was aware of his previous suicide attempts.

The criminal proceeding against him was still open in Ukraine because his conviction in Ukraine had never become final and the appeal proceeding had not been possible since the case materials remained

The agent provoked the applicant by offering his help and actually incited him to order the death of his business rival.

He further denied that his wife’s case was identical to his. He and his wife were separated and her counsel had been very hostile to him throughout the trial.

He submits that, because he had no personal assistant, he was dependent on the other inmates to assist him in his daily activities.

The police officer then drove the applicant to a remote area, bit him on the nose and ear, handcuffed him, forcibly stripped him of all his clothes, threatened him with his service firearm and shot twice

provided him with the identity information of his brother.

Therefore, the applicant could not, in fact, exercise his right of custody and there was no obligation on the part of the tutor to send him reports on his child.

Afterwards police had arrested him and brought him to the police station where they had found some heroin in his pockets. He had bought those drugs from a woman.

    Eyewitnesses Mr M. and Mr S.T. stated that one policeman had grabbed Mr Kaburov and another had hit him with his pistol. Then other policemen had kicked him.

In particular, police officers allegedly beat him up, administered electric shocks to him, suffocated him using a gas mask, inserted needles under his nails, hung him over a metal bar, and attempted to

circumstances of his personal search.

Three guards then knocked him down to the ground and started to hit him with their truncheons. The second applicant was also kicked down to the ground and her camera was snatched away from her.

... exploitait depuis plusieurs années un commerce, dans un chalet édifié par lui ; que, selon acte du 18 novembre 2009, la commune lui a concédé l'occupation précaire de la parcelle pour la saison d'hiver

X... a été embauché en décembre 1964 par la Régie communale des remontées mécaniques de Peisey-Nancroix-Landry en qualité d'employé aux remontées mécaniques pour la saison d'hiver 1964-1965 ; que son contrat

According to the applicant, he refused to give evidence as Shch. had not kept his promises to allow him a meeting with his wife. 23.

Y ordered the applicant to leave his cell and, when the applicant tried to argue his point of view, tried to push him out of the cell.

his friend had been inside. 2.