The medical documents attesting to his injuries were not mentioned either. 20 .

His remaining claims for just satisfaction were dismissed. 3.

were quoted out of context.

The Regional Government found that the building permits were unlawful, as parts of the buildings at issue were wrongly qualified as “lawfully existing” ( Bestand ), although no final building permits for

Me Alain FISSELIER de la SCP AFG, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0044 Assistée de Me Olivia BERNARDEAU-PAUPE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : B0124 INTIMÉE La société C5 MEDICAL WERKS

The applicant did not specify either before the Supreme Court of Ukraine, or before this Court what were the subjects of his requests and complaints.

In July 2007, the Chief Public Prosecutor of Belarus requested that the applicant be extradited offering assurances that Mr   Koktysh would not be sentenced to death; these assurances were reiterated

They were born in 1926 and 1928 respectively and live in Sofia.

The reasons of the judgment were delivered in March 2000. On 18 March 2002 the Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's judgment.

, Président de Chambre Martine CONTE, Conseiller Isabelle DIEPENBROEK, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

Most of the servicemen were in balaclavas and those without masks were of Slavic appearance.

The investigations were later joined and taken over by the Russian Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office (“case no. 159”).

    On 30 July 2002 the investigations were completed and the case was sent to the Zolotonosha Court for trial. 13.

However, the applicant’s factual objections, even assuming they were correct, were irrelevant for the outcome of the expert examination.

– and while they were in police custody.

  Violation of Article 3 (treatment) Violation of Article 5 § 3 Violation of Article 6 § 1 (length) Isayev v.

that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were

Stéphane X..., Mme Isabelle Y... EPOUSE X... épouse X..., M.

The cells were lit by a 100-watt electric bulb. The cells were not equipped with a toilet. Nor was there an outdoor exercise area. B.     The description provided by the applicant 11.