14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 3 November 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 10637/25 Muhammed ŞAHAN against Türkiye lodged on 12 March

The applicant never contacted the Court to indicate any change in his address or to inquire about his case.

In September 2000, the local authority informed the applicant that no further surveillance would be carried out and that the existing recordings had been destroyed.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

It points out in addition that both bodies failed to provide any reasoning in the decisions given in its case. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

  Georgia , no. 70572/16, §§ 100-105, 2 March 2023)?   3.

  23631/2008 and 28727/2011; see also subsequent case-law, in particular Court of Cassation’s judgment no.   6146/2021).

    On 13 December 2006 the POARC quashed the decision of 31   March 2006 and remitted the case for additional investigation. 30.

  In the case of Gagliano Giorgi v.

Casimir, - Y... Philippe, - X...

  By letter dated 1 March 1996, the Government submitted further documents.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

In the case of Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

In the case of Dragan Petrović v.

Marco Della Luna, a lawyer practising in Mantova.        The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

    The applicant’s arrest and alleged ill-treatment on 3-4 March 2009 On 3 March 2009 at approximately 2 p.m. the applicant was arrested on suspicion of robbery.

In November 1996 the case was transferred to the Kraków Nowa-Huta District Court. Hearings were held on 4 February and 26 March 1997.

In the case of Batrakov v.

C/ SA MMA IARD Société MMA IARD ASSURANCES MUTUELLES Etablissement CAMIEG, organisme de sécurité sociale CNMSS Décision déférée à la cour: Jugement rendu le 05 Mars 2014 par le Tribunal de Grande