in similar cases).

The contested articles did not contain mere erroneous information, the veracity of which could be easily established through a rapid procedure that was decided on the basis of the case file.

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

The jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation also clearly established that any criticism of the official thesis on the Armenian issue was caught by Article   301.

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

  The case is numbered 10/1994/457/538.   The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).

The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s case-law, which implemented the case-law of this Court.

[O] [P] a formé un pourvoi en cassation.

    THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1950 and lives in Amöneburg. A. Background to the case 6.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

It is therefore necessary to define as precisely as possible cases where a patient or other persons may acquaint themselves with such information.” C.     Health Care Act 2004 35.

font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } RESOLUTION DH (97) 507 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 27 MARCH 1996 IN THE CASE

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

        The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The mere fact that it was possible for the applicants to leave the transit zone voluntarily could not rule out an infringement of the right to liberty.

  Opinion:   There is no doubt in my mind that these marks are compatible with the history of the case that they were made with a cane.

The public prosecutor had included in the case file extracts from the transcripts of the applicant’s calls that had been intercepted.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant is the father of a son born on 31 August 1997.

– (i) General principles – The case-law principles on when applicants could claim to be victims of interference with their Article   8 rights on account of the mere existence of domestic laws or practices