CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD001373015
23 octobre 2025
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
Page 51 sur 1635
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD004815018
14 janvier 2025
There is hence an issue of general interest which cannot be considered trivial, or, consequently, something that does not deserve an examination on the merits (see, mutatis mutandis , Juhas Đurić v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1106JUD006752209
6 novembre 2014
Furthermore, the witness was not heard by the trial court, but by a Turkish court at the trial court’s request.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD001734213
18 mai 2021
Russian national, Mr Yevgeniy Yuryevich Berestov (“the applicant”), on 16 February 2013; the decision to give notice to the Russian Government (“the Government”) of the complaint concerning fair trial
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120DEC000469204
20 janvier 2009
He also considered its impact quite trivial under the circumstances. However he stressed the importance of the principle at stake.
1ère chambre
DCA_23PA02115_20240201
1 février 2024
A B, représenté par Me Trorial, demande à la Cour : 1°) d'annuler le jugement n° 2216356 du 7 avril 2023 du tribunal administratif de Montreuil ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 14 octobre 2022 du préfet
6ème chambre
DTA_2107009_20230404
4 avril 2023
B C, représenté par Me Trorial , demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 24 juin 2021 par lequel le Préfet de Seine-et-Marne lui a refusé la délivrance d'un titre de séjour, l'a obligé à quitter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC004224698
29 novembre 2001
There had been two pre-trial directions hearings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD003517205
6 novembre 2008
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000220205
4 décembre 2008
Indeed, by hearing the case unbeknownst to Mr T. the District Court deprived the trial of its requisite adversarial character.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217JUD000613403
17 février 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD001446602
10 mars 2009
On 12 February 2003 the applicant lodged a further appeal against the interlocutory decision and, considering that it could influence the trial, on 14 August 2003 she requested adjournment of the main
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD000959006
7 juillet 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD003040002
16 juillet 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001253205
22 septembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD003714702
29 septembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD000101202
4 novembre 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1008JUD002327906
8 octobre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD001284605
His notice of appeal and his written skeleton argument had already been prepared by his lawyer who had appeared before the Supreme Court at the pre-trial stage of the appeal proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD003078203
17 septembre 2009