.) - 45305/99 Decision 4.5.2000 [Section III] Article 34 Victim Relatives of deceased person having received compensation in settlement of civil claim: inadmissible The applicants’ son died as a result

THE LAW On 25 February 2004 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 2 March 2003. They also asked the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases.

Hinder the exercise of the right of petition Failure to comply with interim measure requiring prisoner’s placement in specialised medical establishment: violation   Facts – The first applicant died

He died in hospital the next day. The victim’s cousin, not having heard from him, finally found his body at the morgue.

After having been discharged, on 10 June 2011 she died at the age of 44. The applicant lodged a criminal complaint against the medical staff concerned with the public prosecutor of Diyarbakır.

As regards application no. 19147/08, the Court notes that the applicant died after having lodged his application to the Court.

On 24   May 2012 the first applicant died.

The second applicant died in the course of proceedings before the Court. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent at the time, Ms   V.   Rodić.

    On 8 July 2016 the Government informed the Court that they had learned that the applicant had died on 10 March 2016.

She is the mother of Mr Andrey Vladimirovich Mironov, who died in 2010 following a road traffic accident. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

On 10 August 2004 the applicant’s daughter died of cardiopulmonary arrest associated with stomach cancer at the age of 29.

  The applicant died on 23 August 2020. The Government accepted her husband, Mr Mile Lazić, as her legal heir.

The applicant’s wife died on 1 February 2000.

Handcuffing of prisoner recuperating from internal surgery, and transport in standard prison van two days thereafter: violation   Facts : The applicant's son, Mr   Tarariyev, was born in 1976 and died

    Having received the Court’s letter notifying her husband of the single judge’s decision, in a letter of 7 October 2013 the applicant informed the Court that her husband had died on 29 September

The applicant’s wife died on 20 October 1997, leaving dependant children.

The applicant complains that, when A.Z. died in 1993, he was denied the right to succeed to the tenancy of the apartment on the ground of gender, in breach of Article   14 (prohibition of discrimination

  58914/21 died and that Ms Halina Zofia Ludwikowska, his wife, Ms   Dorota Anna Ludwikowska-Kot, his daughter, and Mr Piotr Stanisław Ludwikowski, his son, expressed their wish to pursue the

The applicant’s wife died on 1 December 1992.

The applicant's wife died on 9 July 1998. On 23 July 2000 the applicant applied to the Benefits Agency for the payment of social security benefits.