CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

6 663 résultats pour « Hiesse Rendu »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000672907

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

It appears that his passport was seized. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC004089498

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2002

14 mai 2002

Between his conviction and the hearing of his appeal, the applicant was detained in Colchester Military Corrective Training Centre.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1120DEC003110204

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2007

20 novembre 2007

The applicant then supplemented his pending objection, which was finally rejected on 30 March 2001.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004003420

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

After divorcing their mother in 2016, he exercised his contact rights in respect of the children and paid child maintenance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC003426209

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

    On 4 December 2008, the applicant was requested to submit his defence statements against those allegations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC001614908

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2010

12 janvier 2010

    The applicant maintained his complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0928DEC004192198

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2000

28 septembre 2000

In his report dated 18 June to the Chief of Staff, he indicated that the statements of the witnesses did not alter his earlier conclusions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002119621

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2022

15 novembre 2022

In 2019 the relevant authorities issued an order withdrawing his residence permit, ordering his deportation and imposing a three-year ban on his re-entering Bosnia and Herzegovina on the ground that, according

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207DEC006800517

Admin. suprême

7 février 2023

7 février 2023

    The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was refused access to a court in civil proceedings relating to his claim for the annulment of his

Source officielle
CA

Chambre des Rétentions

68885733dbf0f4a9225a7769

Appel

27 juillet 2025

27 juillet 2025

FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL D'ORLÉANS Rétention Administrative des Ressortissants Étrangers ORDONNANCE du 27 JUILLET 2025 Minute N° N° RG 25/02193 - N° Portalis DBVN-V-B7J-HIE6

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206139

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2020

19 octobre 2020

In particular, was the combined effect of the authorities’ actions against the applicant such as to render his situation “substantially affected”, in order for him to be considered as a person “charged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0328DEC001419820

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2023

28 mars 2023

Finally, the applicant argued that his trial in the US would constitute an abuse of process and that his extradition would violate Article 6 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2014

24 juillet 2014

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD004883307

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

    The applicant lodged an appeal, arguing, inter alia, that the Rijeka Municipal Court had disregarded his argument that the eviction would render him and his family homeless. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD002093308

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2016

20 décembre 2016

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD001687011

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

The second applicant was injured during the clashes: his index finger was cut off and his middle finger injured.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006480910

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

Neither during his residence in Belarus nor immediately after his arrival in Russia did the applicant seek asylum.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD003232513

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2015

9 juillet 2015

front of his publishing company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0713JUD001938292

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1995

13 juillet 1995

after his arrest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0309DEC001250286

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1988

9 mars 1988

him after their pre-hearing, secret discussions of his case.

Source officielle

Page 52 sur 334

← PrécédentSuivant →