CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000672907
26 juin 2012
It appears that his passport was seized. 11.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC004089498
14 mai 2002
Between his conviction and the hearing of his appeal, the applicant was detained in Colchester Military Corrective Training Centre.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1120DEC003110204
20 novembre 2007
The applicant then supplemented his pending objection, which was finally rejected on 30 March 2001.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004003420
7 mai 2025
After divorcing their mother in 2016, he exercised his contact rights in respect of the children and paid child maintenance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC003426209
29 mai 2018
    On 4 December 2008, the applicant was requested to submit his defence statements against those allegations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC001614908
12 janvier 2010
    The applicant maintained his complaint.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0928DEC004192198
28 septembre 2000
In his report dated 18 June to the Chief of Staff, he indicated that the statements of the witnesses did not alter his earlier conclusions.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002119621
15 novembre 2022
In 2019 the relevant authorities issued an order withdrawing his residence permit, ordering his deportation and imposing a three-year ban on his re-entering Bosnia and Herzegovina on the ground that, according
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207DEC006800517
7 février 2023
    The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was refused access to a court in civil proceedings relating to his claim for the annulment of his
Chambre des Rétentions
68885733dbf0f4a9225a7769
27 juillet 2025
FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL D'ORLÉANS Rétention Administrative des Ressortissants Étrangers ORDONNANCE du 27 JUILLET 2025 Minute N° N° RG 25/02193 - N° Portalis DBVN-V-B7J-HIE6
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206139
19 octobre 2020
In particular, was the combined effect of the authorities’ actions against the applicant such as to render his situation “substantially affected”, in order for him to be considered as a person “charged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0328DEC001419820
28 mars 2023
Finally, the applicant argued that his trial in the US would constitute an abuse of process and that his extradition would violate Article 6 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612
24 juillet 2014
    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD004883307
21 juin 2011
    The applicant lodged an appeal, arguing, inter alia, that the Rijeka Municipal Court had disregarded his argument that the eviction would render him and his family homeless. 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD002093308
20 décembre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD001687011
19 juin 2018
The second applicant was injured during the clashes: his index finger was cut off and his middle finger injured.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006480910
5 juin 2012
Neither during his residence in Belarus nor immediately after his arrival in Russia did the applicant seek asylum.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD003232513
9 juillet 2015
front of his publishing company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0713JUD001938292
13 juillet 1995
after his arrest.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0309DEC001250286
9 mars 1988
him after their pre-hearing, secret discussions of his case.
Page 52 sur 334