After his cellmate had injured himself and had been bleeding, the applicant on the one hand seemed to demand for medical aid to come and assist his cellmate.

The Swiss Office of Migration refused to renew his residence permit, stating that his criminal conviction and his family’s dependence on welfare benefits were grounds for his expulsion.

from his post and to transfer him.

He asked the Registrar to serve a copy of the Government’s observations on him. He presented, however, his declaration of means.

He submitted that criminal charges against him in Russia were concocted on the ground of his religious views.

Lastly, he reiterated his complaints that the trial court had refused his request to postpone the hearing in order to appoint a lawyer of his own choosing and had given him insufficient time to prepare

They also allege that a heated iron wire was inserted in his leg and that a stun gun was used on him.

Law – Article 3: As the applicant had a disability which left him largely confined to a wheelchair – although he could apparently walk at times with the aid of walking sticks or a walking frame – his complaints

The applicant also stressed that the exclusion order violated his right to personal life and his right to freedom of expression as it had made it impossible for him to stay in Russia and carry out his

He submits in particular that he was deprived of his copy of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which prevented him from adequately preparing his defence, and that his request for a lie-detector examination

According to the applicant, this was not done by him or his staff, as the official campaigning period had not yet started (it would start on 15 October 2010).

The court held that the custodial measure applied to the applicant should remain unchanged until 1 April 2010 in view of the gravity of the charges against him, and the risk of his absconding and threatening

The applicant was also summoned by his class master and the headmaster of the school who were angry on him for having problems with the teacher.

The fact that the applicant was detained in a holding centre for illegal immigrants, thus separating him from his partner while she was pregnant with his child, could be seen as an interference with the

They knocked him down, punched and kicked him, beat him with a rubber truncheon, and put a gas mask over his head, blocking his access to air. 9.

His parents, his three siblings and their spouses and children all lived in the same city as him. His parents and his older brother were recognised refugees.

According to the applicant, the police officers handcuffed him, hit him in the face twice and kicked him on various parts of his body. 18 .

correspondence and refused to allow him to contact his lawyers or family at weekends.

  His request was dismissed on 18 November 1996.   On 13 December 1996, upon the applicant’s appeal, the Wrocław Court of Appeal released him on bail.