In the case of Isayev and Others v.

Eleven forensic examinations were carried out, their overall duration amounting to approximately seven months. Two hearings were adjourned due to the applicant’s failure to appear.

    On different dates in 1991 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicants and four other persons. The applicants were charged with the theft of a car tyre.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. A.

None of these observations were communicated to the applicant.

The company maintained that journalists working for its magazine Autoweek – who were doing a feature article on illegal car racing - were given permission to cover the event, provided that they did not

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. 3.

Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 14 October 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Rait Maruste, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Volodymyr Butkevych,   Renate Jaeger,   Isabelle

    Further investigative steps were taken by the police and the prosecutor in the coming days and months.

In 1989 both judgments were quashed and the proceedings against the applicant were terminated on the ground that no criminal offence had been committed.

It held that some of the statements in question were covered by the freedom to express criticism and had not overstepped the relevant limits.

Finally, by an order of 7   September 2005, the Sofia Military Court dropped the criminal proceedings against the police officers on the ground that they were time-barred.

On that latter date, the proceedings were again adjourned until 4 May 2005 because the defence lawyers and witnesses were absent.

to the above applications lodged on the dates below, Having decided to join the applications, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants listed below are Turkish nationals who were

    On 22 August 1991 Dragan Bekić, Nenad Pajić, Miland Kladar and Radovan Kragulj, the applicants’ respective close relatives, were killed. 5.

not fair, in particular that the judges were not impartial.

    If damaging statements ... were disseminated in the media, they should be retracted in the same media ... 5.

According to the first applicant, the leaflets were planted there.

They pushed thought the cordon and went on until they were stopped by the police again at 2 Teatralnyy Proyezd.